The Kogilu Conundrum: When Numbers Don't Tell the Whole Story
Share- Nishadil
- December 30, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 4 Views
Bengaluru's Kogilu Demolitions: A Stark Discrepancy in Lives Affected and the Search for Answers
A critical railway overbridge project in Bengaluru's Kogilu village has sparked confusion and concern as different official surveys provide wildly varying counts of affected families, leaving many residents in limbo.
There’s a quiet yet deeply unsettling drama unfolding in Kogilu village, nestled in Bengaluru North, where the march of urban development is, once again, colliding head-on with human lives. At the heart of it all? A crucial railway overbridge widening project. It's an infrastructure upgrade vital for easing our city’s notorious traffic, no doubt. But here’s the rub: nobody seems to agree on just how many families are actually being displaced, leaving a cloud of uncertainty hanging heavy over the community.
You see, when it comes to projects like these, official surveys are supposed to bring clarity, right? Well, not in Kogilu, it seems. The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, our city’s civic body, initially tallied a significant 63 families who would be impacted by the demolitions. That’s a sizable number, certainly. But then, the South Western Railway (SWR), a key stakeholder in this particular project, came out with their own assessment. And their figure? A starkly lower 10 families. Ten. It’s enough to make you scratch your head and wonder: what on earth is going on here?
This isn't just about differing spreadsheets; it’s about people, their homes, and their futures. The reason for this wild disparity, we’re told, lies in the scope of each survey. The SWR, quite logically from their perspective, focuses primarily on the "private patta land" they absolutely need to acquire for the actual railway track widening. Their mandate is specific, almost surgical. The BBMP, on the other hand, cast a wider net, including properties encroaching on government-designated "Potha Kharab" land – essentially public land reserved for civic amenities – and other private plots adjacent to the project’s footprint. It’s a broader view, perhaps more reflective of the overall displacement, but it complicates everything.
And then there are the residents themselves, whose voices, it must be said, often get lost in the bureaucratic shuffle. They tell a different story altogether. Many in Kogilu insist the real number of affected families is well over 100. Imagine that! They’re not just talking about shanties; some have lived here for decades, built homes, paid property taxes, and even have Aadhar cards registered at these very addresses. For them, the distinction between "Potha Kharab" and "private patta" land is a legal nuance that pales in comparison to the imminent threat of losing their only roof over their heads.
The plight of these families is truly heartbreaking. Many have invested their life savings, their very identities, into these homes. Now, they face an agonizing wait, caught between conflicting official figures and the relentless march of an essential public works project. Will they be compensated fairly? Will rehabilitation be offered? And for those whose homes sit on land deemed "encroachment," even if they’ve lived there for generations, what recourse do they truly have? It’s a deeply human problem, tangled up in land records, development goals, and the desperate need for a clear, compassionate solution.
Ultimately, while the railway overbridge is undoubtedly crucial for Bengaluru's growth and connectivity, we cannot overlook the human cost. This isn’t merely about concrete and steel; it's about communities, livelihoods, and the basic right to shelter. What’s urgently needed now is a unified, transparent assessment that genuinely accounts for every family impacted, regardless of the land classification. Only then can we ensure that progress doesn’t come at the unbearable price of leaving deserving citizens homeless and unheard.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on