The Hidden Flaw: Why Brandon Beane's Draft Record Might Be Less Stellar Than It Seems for the Buffalo Bills
Share- Nishadil
- January 20, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 5 Views
A Closer Look at the Bills' Draft Picks Reveals a Surprising Trend Under GM Brandon Beane
Despite the Buffalo Bills' consistent success, a deeper dive into General Manager Brandon Beane's draft history uncovers a concerning pattern: a significant number of early-round picks from recent years are no longer with the team. Is the GM's lauded tenure actually hiding some underlying draft struggles?
You know, it's funny how narratives take hold in the NFL. For years now, the Buffalo Bills have been heralded as one of the league's most well-run organizations, a model of stability and consistent winning under the dynamic duo of General Manager Brandon Beane and Head Coach Sean McDermott. And rightly so, in many respects! They've transformed a perennial also-ran into a legitimate Super Bowl contender, a feat that felt almost impossible not so long ago.
But sometimes, when you dig just a little deeper beneath the surface, a different picture starts to emerge. While the team's overall trajectory is undeniably upward, a closer examination of Beane's drafting record specifically — not including his brilliant trades, mind you, like landing Stefon Diggs — paints a somewhat less rosy portrait. It's a bit of a head-scratcher, really, especially for a GM whose reputation is otherwise sterling.
Consider this truly astonishing statistic, and it's one that might just make you do a double-take: Out of the 46 players the Bills drafted between 2018 and 2021, a staggering 14 of them are no longer on the roster. That's nearly a third of all his picks from that four-year span. And here's where it gets particularly interesting, even a little concerning: many of these departures weren't just late-round fliers. We're talking about significant draft capital, including players taken in the first, second, and third rounds.
It really makes you wonder, doesn't it? For a team that's supposedly in its prime Super Bowl window, a high attrition rate among early-round selections is, well, less than ideal. Every draft pick represents an investment, a chance to infuse new talent, youth, and cost-controlled contracts into the team. When a substantial portion of those investments, particularly the high-value ones, don't pan out or simply aren't retained, it leaves a void that needs to be filled elsewhere.
Now, let's be fair. Beane has absolutely hit on some colossal picks. Josh Allen is obviously the centerpiece, a franchise-altering quarterback who came from his draft class. Tremaine Edmunds, though now with the Bears, was a solid first-round talent. And let's not forget the shrewdness involved in acquiring a game-changer like Diggs via trade. Those kinds of moves, the grand slam decisions, often overshadow the singles and doubles – or the strikeouts, as the case may be – from the draft itself.
However, the underlying truth is that even the best GMs aren't perfect. But for a team with Super Bowl aspirations, a high hit rate in the draft is crucial for sustained success and managing the salary cap effectively. When you're consistently seeing early-round talent walk out the door, it places extra pressure on subsequent drafts and free agency to fill those gaps. It means less organic growth from within the draft classes themselves.
So, while the Bills continue to soar, perhaps it's worth acknowledging that not every aspect of their roster construction has been flawless. Brandon Beane has built an incredible team, no doubt about it. But this particular draft fact serves as a compelling, if slightly uncomfortable, reminder that even the most successful executives have areas where improvement could be made. It's not about criticizing success; it's about understanding the nuances that contribute to it, or perhaps, detract from it over the long haul.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on