The Gravity of Aging: When a Zomato CEO Met a Doctor's Fact-Check
Share- Nishadil
- November 19, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 2 Views
You know how it is on the internet, right? One moment you’re scrolling through cat videos, and the next, a prominent tech CEO drops a mind-bender of a theory that makes you scratch your head. This time, it was Zomato's own Deepinder Goyal, who recently took to social media with a rather... unique hypothesis about aging and, of all things, gravity.
He suggested, rather earnestly, that perhaps those of us residing on higher floors might actually age faster due to the subtly diminished gravitational pull. And conversely, if you're living closer to the Earth's core, say on the ground floor, well, you might just be stretching out your youth a little longer. It was a fascinating thought, to be sure – one that quickly went viral, as these things often do, sparking a flurry of comments and, naturally, a good deal of head-tilting confusion.
But hold on a minute, because enter Dr. Cyriac Abby Philips, a physician from Kochi, better known to his considerable online following as TheLiverDoc. With a reputation for meticulously dismantling medical myths and, it turns out, physics fables, Dr. Philips wasn’t about to let this particular 'gravity aging theory' float unchecked. And honestly, for once, we're glad someone with actual scientific chops stepped in.
He didn't mince words, branding Goyal’s theory as, simply put, 'junk science.' While it’s true that Albert Einstein’s general relativity does include a concept called gravitational time dilation – meaning time literally passes at different rates depending on how strong a gravitational field you're in – the real-world impact on our everyday lives is, well, practically non-existent. We're talking nanoseconds over a lifetime, not a noticeable difference in your wrinkle count because you chose a penthouse over a basement apartment. The doctor patiently explained that while the physics is indeed real, applying it to human aging in such a simplistic, exaggerated manner misses the entire point of its incredibly subtle effects.
And this, you could say, is where the real lesson lies. In an age where information – and, regrettably, misinformation – spreads at the speed of light, it’s all too easy for well-meaning but ill-informed pronouncements, even from respected figures, to take root. Dr. Philips subtly pointed out how often 'science communicators' with a superficial understanding might inadvertently mislead the public. It underscores, rather dramatically, the vital need for critical thinking, for seeking out genuine expertise, and perhaps, for taking bold, sweeping scientific claims on social media with a healthy dose of skepticism. Because sometimes, a fascinating thought is just that: a thought, and not a scientific breakthrough waiting to be discovered by a tech entrepreneur.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on