The Geopolitical Chessboard: Why Pakistan's SCO Objections Against Azerbaijan and India Ring Hollow
Share- Nishadil
- September 04, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 8 Views

The intricate tapestry of Eurasian geopolitics is currently witnessing a fascinating subplot: the potential full membership of Azerbaijan and India in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). While India's entry has been a topic of discussion for some time, Azerbaijan's inclusion, particularly in light of evolving regional dynamics, has brought to the fore intriguing diplomatic maneuvers.
At the heart of this unfolding drama appears to be Pakistan's alleged resistance, adding layers of complexity to the SCO's expansion.
For years, Pakistan has been a staunch ally of Azerbaijan, particularly vocal in its support over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Yet, a shift in regional alliances, notably the burgeoning strategic partnership between India and Azerbaijan, seems to have stirred the pot.
This burgeoning camaraderie, often dubbed 'Operation Sindoor' by some analysts, represents a multi-faceted collaboration ranging from defense and energy to connectivity projects like the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC). This deepening bond, however, is perceived by Pakistan as a direct strategic threat, igniting concerns about encirclement and influence in its immediate neighborhood.
The narrative of 'Operation Sindoor' highlights a perceived strategic alignment where India, seeking to enhance its footprint in Eurasia and bypass traditional routes, finds a willing partner in Azerbaijan, a key player in the Caspian region and a vital link in the INSTC.
This partnership holds immense promise for both nations, offering alternative trade routes, energy security, and defense cooperation that could reshape regional power dynamics. For Pakistan, however, this evolving equation represents a challenging realignment, particularly given its historical rivalry with India and its strategic interests in Central Asia and the wider Eurasian landmass.
The SCO, an organization initially formed to counter terrorism and enhance regional security, has expanded its mandate to include economic cooperation.
As such, the inclusion of nations like Azerbaijan and India, with their significant geopolitical and economic weight, would undoubtedly strengthen the bloc. However, the path to full membership requires consensus from existing members, providing any nation with the potential to delay or even veto such moves.
Pakistan, as a full member, reportedly leverages this position to express its reservations, particularly against Azerbaijan, thereby indirectly complicating India's broader ambitions within the SCO framework.
This diplomatic friction underscores the intricate web of bilateral relationships intersecting within multilateral forums.
While the official reasons for any potential delay remain under wraps, geopolitical observers point to Pakistan's concerns over the India-Azerbaijan axis, viewing it through the lens of its own strategic vulnerabilities. The irony is not lost on many: a country that once championed Azerbaijan's cause now finds itself in a position where it might be seen as hindering its progress on a global stage, all due to evolving strategic interests and the ever-present shadow of regional rivalries.
Ultimately, the SCO's expansion, particularly concerning Azerbaijan and India, will be a testament to its ability to navigate complex member-state dynamics.
Whether Pakistan's reported objections can truly impede these nations' aspirations, or if the broader geopolitical currents favoring stronger Eurasian integration will prevail, remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the 'Operation Sindoor' narrative and its implications are playing a significant, albeit understated, role in the ongoing diplomatic discourse surrounding the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on