Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The End of an Era: Shankar, Delhi Zoo's Lone African Elephant, Succumbs to Heart Failure Amidst Welfare Concerns

  • Nishadil
  • September 21, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 6 Views
The End of an Era: Shankar, Delhi Zoo's Lone African Elephant, Succumbs to Heart Failure Amidst Welfare Concerns

A profound sense of loss has swept through the nation's capital following the announcement of Shankar's death, the Delhi Zoo's sole African elephant. The majestic tusker, estimated to be around 29 to 30 years old, succumbed to acute cardiac failure – a myocardial infarction – on October 18, closing a chapter marked by both admiration and intense controversy over his living conditions.

Shankar, a diplomatic gift from Zimbabwe to India in 1998, had been a prominent fixture at the National Zoological Park for over two decades.

However, his long life at the zoo was far from peaceful, frequently becoming a focal point for animal rights activists and public concern. For years, organizations like PETA India, alongside various individuals and legal entities, tirelessly advocated for his relocation to a more natural, expansive sanctuary.

Their arguments frequently highlighted Shankar's solitary existence, the concrete confines of his enclosure, and allegations of chaining, all believed to contribute to severe stress and psychological distress for a highly social animal like an elephant.

The plight of Shankar even reached the Delhi High Court on multiple occasions.

Petitions were filed, seeking judicial intervention to secure a better life for the elephant. Activists pointed to his visibly deteriorating health and behavior, arguing that the zoo environment was fundamentally inadequate for an animal of his size and complex social needs. They emphasized the inherent cruelty of keeping an elephant in isolation, deprived of the company of his own kind and the natural stimulation of a wild habitat.

Despite the persistent calls for his transfer, zoo authorities consistently defended their care for Shankar.

They maintained that his enclosure met all required standards and that he received regular veterinary attention and appropriate nourishment. Officials often cited Shankar's allegedly aggressive nature as a primary reason for not introducing another elephant or relocating him, suggesting that moving such a large, potentially volatile animal could pose significant risks to both the animal and handlers.

His death, confirmed through a meticulous post-mortem conducted by a panel of expert veterinarians, including those from the esteemed IVRI Bareilly, has reignited the poignant debate surrounding animal welfare in zoos.

While the immediate cause of death has been identified as a heart attack, many are left wondering if the decades of confinement and isolation played a contributing role in the premature end of this magnificent creature. Shankar's story serves as a stark reminder of the responsibilities humanity holds towards the animals in its care and the ongoing challenge of balancing conservation efforts with the inherent needs of wild species.

The passing of Shankar is more than just the loss of an animal; it's a poignant moment that compels us to reflect on the ethical implications of keeping wild animals in captivity and the collective efforts required to ensure their well-being.

May his memory inspire a renewed commitment to compassionate animal care and a deeper understanding of these sentient beings.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on