Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The Elgaar Parishad Case: Unpacking Bail, Incarceration, and the Ongoing Legal Battle

  • Nishadil
  • December 05, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 4 Views
The Elgaar Parishad Case: Unpacking Bail, Incarceration, and the Ongoing Legal Battle

The Elgaar Parishad case, a legal saga that has truly gripped national attention, continues to unfold with its twists and turns. It's a complex narrative, really, centering around 16 individuals accused in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence of January 1, 2018, and a much broader alleged Maoist conspiracy. For years, this case has been under intense scrutiny, not just for the serious charges involved, but also for the prolonged incarceration of many of the accused under stringent anti-terror laws.

Interestingly enough, there's been a significant shift in recent times, with several of the accused finally securing bail after what feels like an eternity for them and their families. As of April 2024, exactly half of the 16 original accused – that's eight individuals – have managed to walk out of jail, albeit often with stringent conditions. The latest to join this group is Professor Shoma Sen, whose bail was finally granted by the Supreme Court this April. Her release, like others before her, offers a glimmer of hope, perhaps, for those still awaiting their turn.

Let's take a moment to look at those who've secured their freedom, even if temporary. The list is notable: there’s Sudha Bharadwaj, a human rights lawyer, who got default bail way back in December 2021. Then we have scholars and activists like Anand Teltumbde, who was granted bail in April 2023, and Gautam Navlakha, whose bail came through in December 2023. Mahesh Raut, a young researcher, secured his release in September 2023. Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira, both authors and activists, were granted bail together in July 2023. And let's not forget the poet Varavara Rao, who received medical bail in February 2022, a testament to the health challenges faced by some of the elderly accused. These releases, as you can imagine, haven't been easy, often involving lengthy legal battles stretching all the way to the Supreme Court.

However, the fight for justice and freedom is far from over for everyone involved. While eight are out, a significant number still remain behind bars. Currently, six living individuals are still incarcerated in connection with this case: Rona Wilson, Surendra Gadling, Hany Babu, Jyoti Jagtap, Sagar Gorkhe, and Ramesh Gaichor. Their continued detention underscores the formidable challenge posed by the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, or UAPA, under which bail is notoriously difficult to obtain. The legal hurdles are immense, demanding a high bar of proof to demonstrate that the accusations are not "prima facie true" – a phrase that holds immense power in these proceedings.

And, tragically, two of the original 16 accused are no longer with us. Father Stan Swamy, an 84-year-old Jesuit priest and tribal rights activist, passed away in July 2021 while still in judicial custody, a truly heartbreaking development that sparked widespread condemnation and highlighted serious concerns about the treatment of elderly undertrials. The 16th accused, Milind Teltumbde, was killed in an encounter with security forces in November 2021, shifting the case's dynamics in a different, equally somber way.

This entire case, you see, isn't just about the individuals; it's also a significant commentary on India's criminal justice system, particularly concerning sedition and anti-terror laws. The sheer duration of the trials, the struggle for basic rights, and the often-debated nature of the evidence have all contributed to making the Elgaar Parishad case a touchstone for discussions on human rights, civil liberties, and the delicate balance between national security and individual freedoms. It's a narrative that continues to evolve, reminding us of the human cost behind every legal proceeding.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on