The Echo of 2019: Chandrababu Naidu's Past Outcry Over Voter Deletions Rings True Amidst 2024 Election Concerns
Share- Nishadil
- September 19, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 5 Views

The political landscape is often a stage for fascinating shifts, and few episodes highlight this better than the striking parallel between Chandrababu Naidu's vehement protests in 2019 and Rahul Gandhi's current concerns regarding electoral fairness in 2024. Five years ago, Naidu, then a fierce critic of the BJP and now its ally, spearheaded a passionate campaign against alleged large-scale voter deletions and electoral malpractices, eerily similar to the issues being flagged by the Congress leader today.
In the run-up to the 2019 general elections, Naidu, then the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh and head of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), had launched a blistering attack on both the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Election Commission of India (ECI).
His accusations were severe: he alleged a conspiracy to systematically delete the votes of minorities and opposition supporters, particularly in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. "They are deleting the names of voters who are not voting for them. The names of those who have settled here from different states are being deleted.
This is happening mostly with minorities. This is very serious," Naidu had declared, pointing fingers directly at the ruling party at the Centre.
Naidu’s claims weren't merely rhetorical. He cited a report by former IAS officer Nimmagadda Ramesh Kumar, which suggested that nearly 60 lakh names had been removed from voter lists across Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.
The TDP chief meticulously detailed how these deletions disproportionately affected his party’s potential voters, accusing the BJP of manipulating the electoral process to its advantage. He questioned the EC's impartiality, alleging that the commission was acting at the behest of the central government, a charge that resonates strongly with current critiques of electoral bodies.
His indignation led him to gather a coalition of opposition leaders, including Mamata Banerjee of the Trinamool Congress and Arvind Kejriwal of the Aam Aadmi Party, to collectively raise concerns about Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) reliability and voter list integrity.
These meetings were designed to present a united front against what they perceived as a systemic assault on democratic principles. Naidu's conviction was palpable; he genuinely believed the electoral system was being compromised, echoing the sentiments of many opposition parties today.
Fast forward to 2024, and the script has a familiar ring.
Rahul Gandhi, leading the Congress, has been vocal about alleged "match-fixing" by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP, raising serious questions about the fairness of the electoral process, including concerns over EVMs and the transparency of voter lists. The irony is stark: Chandrababu Naidu, who once championed these very same concerns, now stands allied with the party he accused of electoral malpractices.
His silence on these matters, or rather, his new alignment, highlights the fluid nature of political alliances and the often-expedient memory of past criticisms.
This historical reflection serves as a powerful reminder that fundamental questions about the integrity of the electoral system persist, transcending party lines and shifting allegiances.
While the players on the political stage may change their roles, the underlying anxieties about fair elections remain a constant, underscoring the vital need for transparency and trust in democratic institutions.
.- India
- News
- Politics
- PoliticsNews
- BJP
- Congress
- 2024Elections
- ElectionIntegrity
- RahulGandhi
- ChandrababuNaidu
- Tdp
- ElectionCommission
- IndiaElections
- PoliticalAllegations
- ElectoralIntegrity
- Nda
- VoterDeletion
- PoliticalIrony
- VoterDeletions
- VoteChori
- BjpAlly
- TdpIsBjpAlly
- DeletionFiles
- AndhraCm
- 2019Elections
- EvmConcerns
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on