The Dallas Cowboys' Running Back Quest: Why Javonte Williams Isn't the Solution You're Hoping For
Share- Nishadil
- December 17, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 13 Views
Javonte Williams to Cowboys? A Hard 'No' (And Here's Why)
With Tony Pollard now a Titan, the Dallas Cowboys are searching for a new lead running back. While some fans might eye Javonte Williams, the reality of a potential trade makes it an impossible dream.
Ah, the Dallas Cowboys. Never a dull moment, especially when it comes to the running back position. With Tony Pollard having packed his bags for Nashville and the Titans, there's a definite void in the Cowboys' backfield. Naturally, as fans do, minds start to wander, scanning the NFL landscape for that perfect, game-changing talent. And for some, the name Javonte Williams has popped up as a tantalizing 'what if'. But let's pump the brakes just a moment, because while the thought might be appealing, the reality is a much harder, and quite frankly, easier answer than you might think.
So, should the Cowboys try to bring Javonte Williams aboard? The short, blunt answer, my friends, is a resounding 'no.' And it's not because Williams isn't a phenomenal talent when healthy; quite the opposite. It's simply not feasible, not practical, and honestly, not something the Cowboys are likely to even consider.
First things first: Javonte Williams is not a free agent. Let's be crystal clear on that. He's currently under contract with the Denver Broncos. This isn't a scenario where Jerry Jones can just pick up the phone and offer him a hefty check. Any move for Williams would necessitate a trade, and that, right there, is the first major hurdle. Do the Broncos have any incentive to just give away one of their most promising young offensive weapons?
Then there's the significant injury history. Poor Javonte has been through the wringer, coming off a brutal knee injury that included tears to his ACL, LCL, PCL, and the posterolateral corner. That's a laundry list of damage that would make any general manager pause. While he returned last season, and admirably so, the long-term impact and the risk of re-injury are always present. Would the Cowboys really gamble significant assets on a running back with such a complex medical file, especially given their historical philosophy on the position?
And speaking of assets, what would it even cost to pry Williams away from Denver? The Broncos, despite drafting Audric Estime, still value Williams highly. They'd likely demand a premium draft pick, perhaps a second-rounder, maybe even more, to part with him. The Cowboys, who've famously been hesitant to invest high draft capital or big money into running backs in recent years (just look at how Zeke Elliott was handled, or Pollard's departure), simply aren't going to make that kind of move for an injured player, no matter how talented.
Think about the Cowboys' current approach. They've opted for a committee of more cost-effective options like Rico Dowdle, Deuce Vaughn, Snoop Conner, and their recent fourth-round pick, Marshawn Lloyd. Their strategy appears to be: find value, rotate backs, and don't overspend. A trade for Javonte Williams, with his contract and injury profile, goes completely against that grain. It would be a dramatic pivot, one that just doesn't align with their recent patterns.
So, while it's fun to dream of Williams's power and elusive running in a Cowboys uniform, let's keep our feet firmly on the ground. He's a Bronco, he's recovering from a massive injury, and the cost of acquiring him would be astronomical for a team that simply doesn't prioritize the running back position in that manner. It's a non-starter, an impossible dream, and frankly, an easy 'no' for the Dallas front office. The Cowboys will look for their solution elsewhere, almost certainly within their current roster or through the lower rounds of the draft.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on