Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The Algorithmic Tug-of-War: Dogecoin Founder's Frustration Meets Elon Musk's Concurrence

  • Nishadil
  • February 13, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 6 Views
The Algorithmic Tug-of-War: Dogecoin Founder's Frustration Meets Elon Musk's Concurrence

Dogecoin Co-Creator Billy Markus Calls Out X's Algorithm, Elon Musk Doesn't Disagree

Dogecoin co-founder Billy Markus publicly criticized X's algorithm for stifling creator reach, prompting a surprising agreement from platform owner Elon Musk, highlighting widespread concerns.

There's a quiet hum of frustration often buzzing among social media users, particularly those who create content and rely on platforms for reach. We've all felt it, haven't we? That nagging feeling that our posts, no matter how carefully crafted or genuinely interesting, just aren't getting seen by as many people as they used to. Well, it seems even the co-creator of Dogecoin, Billy Markus — better known online as Shibetoshi Nakamoto — has had enough, and he’s not holding back his feelings about X's (formerly Twitter's) algorithm.

Markus recently took to X itself, delivering a rather candid, almost exasperated, critique of the platform's core mechanics. "I really hate your algorithm," he declared, pulling no punches. He then elaborated, sharing a common sentiment: despite boasting a follower count well over 2 million, his posts now seem to reach a fraction of that audience, often garnering just tens of thousands of impressions. It’s a significant drop, one that many creators can sadly relate to, leaving them scratching their heads and wondering what changed.

He didn’t stop there, either. Markus passionately argued that this algorithmic shift is effectively "killing the creator economy," making it increasingly difficult for individuals to organically connect with their audience and, by extension, earn a living or simply share their voice effectively. It's a poignant observation, considering how much platforms like X have been championed as vital tools for independent creators and artists. When the very system designed to connect people starts feeling like it's building walls instead, well, that's a problem.

What makes this particular complaint even more noteworthy, almost a little surreal, is who decided to weigh in. None other than Elon Musk, the platform's owner and a man famously unafraid to speak his mind, responded directly to Markus. And guess what? He actually agreed! "I don't love the algorithm either," Musk candidly admitted, adding that the team is "working on it." Now, isn't that something? To have the boss himself acknowledge the very pain point users are experiencing – it lends a certain weight to the collective grumbling.

Musk’s concession, while perhaps a brief moment of solidarity, certainly doesn't solve the underlying issue overnight. It does, however, shine a brighter spotlight on the complex, often opaque, world of social media algorithms. These aren't just lines of code; they are the invisible gatekeepers determining what we see, who sees us, and ultimately, how information flows across vast digital networks. For creators, influencers, and even just regular users, the desire for transparency and fairness in these systems is paramount.

Ultimately, this exchange between a prominent crypto figure and one of the most influential tech entrepreneurs of our time highlights a universal struggle: the tension between platform optimization (often for advertising revenue) and genuine user experience. Whether X can truly "fix" its algorithm to satisfy its vast user base, including those like Billy Markus who feel their reach diminishing, remains to be seen. But for now, it's a stark reminder that even the biggest voices sometimes feel unheard in the algorithmic echo chamber.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on