Delhi | 25°C (windy)

The AI Paradox: Why Indians Still Choose Cash Over Clicks

  • Nishadil
  • September 20, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 4 Views
The AI Paradox: Why Indians Still Choose Cash Over Clicks

India's digital marketplace is a vibrant, ever-evolving landscape, but beneath its gleaming surface of technological advancement lies a fascinating paradox. While artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the online shopping experience, making it faster, smarter, and more personalized, a significant majority of consumers still cling to a familiar, traditional method of payment: Cash on Delivery (COD).

A recent report by Redseer Strategy Consultants has brought this intriguing dichotomy to light.

The study reveals that a staggering 87 percent of Indian online shoppers acknowledge that AI has made their shopping journeys remarkably faster. Yet, in a captivating twist, an even higher proportion—88 percent—consistently opt for Cash on Delivery for their purchases. This isn't just a preference; it's a testament to a unique blend of innovation adoption and deep-seated consumer habits.

The allure of AI in e-commerce is undeniable.

It's revolutionizing how we discover products, personalizing recommendations with impressive accuracy for 80 percent of users. AI-driven tools help 85 percent of shoppers find new items they love, while virtual try-ons and augmented reality features, appreciated by 75 percent, bridge the gap between digital browsing and real-world experience.

Furthermore, AI holds the promise of supercharging customer service, with 70-75 percent faster query resolution and a potential 15-20 percent boost in customer satisfaction.

So, why the steadfast loyalty to COD? The reasons are multifaceted, deeply rooted in trust, convenience, and a perceived sense of security.

For many, especially in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, COD offers a tangible guarantee: pay only when the product is physically in hand. It mitigates fears of online fraud, failed transactions, or receiving incorrect items, providing a psychological comfort that digital payments sometimes lack.

However, the embrace of AI also comes with its own set of anxieties.

Data privacy stands out as a paramount concern, with a significant 90 percent of consumers expressing worries about how their personal information is used and protected. Another key apprehension, voiced by 80 percent of shoppers, is the perceived lack of human interaction in fully automated customer service.

While AI excels at efficiency, the human touch—empathy, nuanced understanding, and problem-solving—remains invaluable, particularly for complex issues.

Even in customer support, where AI can drastically improve response times, the desire for human interaction persists. The report suggests that while AI can handle routine queries swiftly, a hybrid approach, combining AI's efficiency with human agents for intricate problems, could be the sweet spot, enhancing both speed and satisfaction.

The segmentation of the market further illustrates these dynamics.

While the broader consumer base, particularly outside metropolitan hubs, leans towards COD, segments like luxury shoppers often prefer secure, trackable digital payment methods, highlighting a correlation between purchase value, digital literacy, and payment preferences.

As India's e-commerce ecosystem matures, the challenge for platforms will be to skillfully navigate this paradox.

The future likely lies not in an either/or scenario, but in a harmonious integration: leveraging AI's incredible power for speed, personalization, and efficiency, while simultaneously building robust trust mechanisms, ensuring data privacy, and retaining avenues for human-centric service. Only then can online shopping truly evolve to meet the diverse and often contradictory demands of the Indian consumer.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on