Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Supreme Court Takes Vantara Under Its Wing: Ensuring Ethical Wildlife Care at Reliance's Grand Initiative

  • Nishadil
  • September 16, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 1 Views
Supreme Court Takes Vantara Under Its Wing: Ensuring Ethical Wildlife Care at Reliance's Grand Initiative

In a landmark move underscoring its unwavering commitment to animal welfare, the Supreme Court of India has taken the ambitious Vantara wildlife rehabilitation and rescue centre under its vigilant watch. This sprawling facility, a significant initiative by the Reliance Foundation spearheaded by Anant Ambani, now operates under stringent judicial oversight, ensuring its noble mission remains ethically sound and legally compliant.

Vantara, which translates to 'Star of the Forest', is conceptualized as a beacon of hope for thousands of injured, abused, and threatened animals across India and beyond.

Located in Jamnagar, Gujarat, it aims to provide state-of-the-art medical care, rehabilitation, and a safe haven for creatures in distress. However, the sheer scale and private nature of the project have drawn public and judicial attention, culminating in the Supreme Court's proactive intervention.

A bench comprising Justices B.R.

Gavai and Sandeep Mehta issued a clear set of directives, drawing a definitive line to prevent any potential misuse or deviation from its core welfare objectives. Foremost among these mandates is the absolute prohibition of any commercial activity within Vantara. The court explicitly stated that the centre's operations must be purely non-commercial, dedicated solely to the rescue, treatment, and rehabilitation of animals without any profit motive.

Crucially, the Supreme Court underscored the imperative for Vantara to operate in strict adherence to all relevant Indian laws.

This includes, but is not limited to, the stringent provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. This legal framework is designed to safeguard animal rights and ensure that all transfers, treatments, and rehabilitations are conducted with the utmost legality and care.

To ensure robust accountability and expertise, the court has mandated the formation of a high-level expert committee.

This committee, to be nominated by the Central government, will comprise seasoned forest and wildlife professionals. Their role will be comprehensive, overseeing all facets of Vantara's operations, from the acquisition of animals to their ongoing care and eventual rehabilitation. This independent oversight mechanism is designed to provide an additional layer of scrutiny and guidance.

Transparency is another cornerstone of the Supreme Court's directives.

Vantara is now required to maintain meticulous and detailed records of every animal brought into the facility, including their origin, medical history, treatment protocols, and rehabilitation progress. These comprehensive records will be made readily accessible to the expert committee, ensuring complete visibility and auditability of the centre's activities.

Furthermore, the court has directed that any Public Interest Litigations (PILs) concerning Vantara's functioning should be exclusively filed before the Supreme Court itself, centralizing legal oversight and preventing fragmented litigation.

This judicial monitoring is a testament to India's commitment to protecting its diverse wildlife and ensuring that even large-scale private initiatives align perfectly with national conservation goals and ethical standards.

The Supreme Court's proactive stance ensures that Vantara, with its ambitious vision for animal welfare, operates under the highest benchmarks of legality, transparency, and expert guidance, truly living up to its promise as a sanctuary for those who cannot speak for themselves.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on