Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Simi Garewal's Ravan Post Ignites Fiery Debate: A Deep Dive into Netizen Reactions

  • Nishadil
  • October 03, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 2 Views
Simi Garewal's Ravan Post Ignites Fiery Debate: A Deep Dive into Netizen Reactions

Veteran actress Simi Garewal recently stirred a potent storm on social media with a contemplative post about Ravan, the antagonist from the epic Ramayana. Her words, expressing a surprising pang of sympathy for the demon king at the moment of his demise, resonated deeply with some while vehemently offending others, sparking a widespread and passionate debate across online platforms.

Garewal's thought-provoking reflection centered on a poignant line from the 1992 animated film 'Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama': "The moment he died, his ten heads, each representing a passion, broke free and flew into the air, and for a brief moment, the sky was filled with them." This evocative imagery led her to ponder the tragic finality of Ravan’s existence, prompting a public discourse on the complexities of good and evil within mythological narratives.

The reactions from netizens were, predictably, polarized.

One segment of the online community lauded Garewal's nuanced perspective, acknowledging Ravan not merely as a villain but as a multi-dimensional character. They highlighted his formidable intellect, his profound devotion to Lord Shiva, and his unparalleled scholarship. For these users, Ravan's story embodies a tragic downfall—a figure capable of immense greatness yet ultimately consumed by his ego and desires.

They resonated with the idea of a moment of sympathy, viewing his death as the tragic end of a complex being, rather than a straightforward triumph of good over evil.

Conversely, a significant portion of netizens reacted with strong condemnation, finding Garewal's sympathy misplaced and offensive.

These users vehemently reminded her of Ravan's heinous deeds, particularly the abduction of Sita and the immense suffering he inflicted upon countless others. For them, Ravan epitomizes pure evil, and his death was a righteous outcome, a necessary act of justice. They argued that glorifying or sympathizing with such a character disregards the pain of his victims and distorts the fundamental moral lessons of the Ramayana.

The idea of pitying a character who committed such atrocities was seen as an affront to deeply held cultural and religious sentiments.

This online tussle underscores the enduring power of ancient epics and their characters to provoke contemporary discussions about morality, ethics, and human nature.

Simi Garewal’s post inadvertently opened a Pandora's Box, revealing the diverse and often conflicting interpretations that continue to surround mythological figures like Ravan, proving that even centuries later, their stories have the capacity to ignite intense introspection and passionate debate among the public.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on