Scandal Rocks Karnataka Police: IPS Officer Under Fire for Alleged Domestic Abuse and Dowry Harassment

A major scandal has erupted, drawing national attention as a Karnataka-cadre Indian Police Service (IPS) officer, Dr. Seema Latkar, has been booked by the Noida Police on grave charges of alleged dowry harassment, physical abuse, unnatural sex, and criminal intimidation. The shocking First Information Report (FIR) was lodged by his wife, Tejaswini A., at the Sector 49 police station in Noida, painting a grim picture of marital discord and alleged sustained abuse.

According to the detailed complaint filed by Tejaswini, the harrowing ordeal began shortly after their marriage in 2017.

She alleges a relentless pattern of physical and mental torture, coupled with persistent demands for dowry. The accusations are particularly disturbing, including claims of forced abortions and explicit demands for the transfer of properties to the officer's name. These serious allegations have cast a long shadow over the reputation of a high-ranking public servant.

The police report indicates that the initial investigation has commenced, with authorities looking into the various facets of the wife's complaint.

The FIR specifically cites sections 498A (dowry harassment), 377 (unnatural offenses), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace), and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

In a dramatic turn, Dr. Seema Latkar vehemently denies all allegations, asserting that he is being maliciously framed.

The officer claims that his wife has resorted to creating fake social media accounts to defame him and has also accused her of blackmail. He maintains his innocence, suggesting that the complaint is an attempt to tarnish his image and career.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the case continues to attract significant public and media scrutiny.

The Noida Police have confirmed that a thorough investigation is underway to ascertain the veracity of the claims made by both parties. This high-profile case underscores the complexities of domestic disputes, especially when they involve individuals in positions of power, leaving the public awaiting the outcome of a fair and impartial inquiry.