Sabarimala's Stolen Gold: A Cry for Truth Beyond Local Hands?
Share- Nishadil
- November 06, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 1 Views
Sabarimala, that revered shrine nestled amidst Kerala’s hills, often feels like a national pulse point, a beacon for millions. But lately, its hallowed grounds are echoing with a different kind of clamour: the unsettling whisper of missing gold. And honestly, it’s not just a whisper anymore; it’s a full-throated demand for answers, spearheaded by none other than BJP Member of Parliament, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, who insists a central agency simply must step in.
You see, for Chandrasekhar, this isn't merely a local police matter. Oh no. The recent alleged gold theft from the temple's strongroom—a detail hotly contested, mind you—is, in his view, a glaring symptom of a much deeper malady. He's openly questioned the state government's commitment, or perhaps its sheer capability, when it comes to safeguarding one of India’s most significant pilgrimage sites. And really, can you blame him for wondering?
His critique isn't a shot in the dark; it’s rooted in what he perceives as a rather disheartening pattern. Sabarimala, tragically, has become, you could say, a repeat customer in the court of public suspicion. Think about it: allegations of Vazhipadu scams, those temple offering irregularities, or even previous instances of silver and gold plating scandals — they all paint a picture, don’t they? A picture where the sacred assets entrusted to the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) seem, at times, precariously managed. It’s almost as if the very institutions meant to protect are, for various reasons, failing.
This latest incident? Chandrasekhar labels it a "big scam," a substantial enough transgression to warrant the highest level of investigation. And, perhaps understandably, he's left scratching his head, publicly asking why the state government hasn't already — without prompting, one might add — requested a probe by a central agency. It’s not just about a few grams, or a piece of jewelry; it’s about trust, about the sanctity of a national treasure.
Then there’s the curious case of the disappearing details. P.S. Prasanth, the TDB President, reportedly dismissed the incident as "just a gold garland," a minor pilfering, certainly not something from the much-vaunted strongroom. But Chandrasekhar, well, he’s having none of it. He argues, quite forcefully, that this attempted downplaying only adds fuel to the fire, suggesting a worrying lack of transparency or, worse, an attempt to gloss over a serious breach. A gold garland, or gold from the strongroom? The distinction, in truth, feels rather crucial here, doesn't it?
The MP’s words are sharp, cutting to the quick: "This theft of gold and the continuous cover-up and mismanagement is yet another proof of the absolute incompetence and lack of interest on the part of the state government and the TDB to protect the assets of Sabarimala." Strong words, indeed, but they resonate with a certain frustration, a sense that this isn’t just an isolated incident but part of a larger, systemic issue. He's even hinted at the involvement of a "big network," implying a level of sophistication and, perhaps, official complicity that a local investigation simply couldn't unravel.
So, the ball, it seems, is squarely in the court of the Chief Minister. Chandrasekhar’s plea is clear and urgent: refer this gold theft case to a central agency immediately. For the sake of Sabarimala’s sanctity, for the millions who hold it dear, and for the integrity of its assets, a thorough, impartial investigation, free from any local political shadows, feels, for once, like an absolute necessity. Because when sacred gold goes missing, the search for truth shouldn't stop at the state border.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on