RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat: Organizational Restraint on Kashi and Mathura, But Individual Freedom Remains

In a significant clarification, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat has stated unequivocally that the Sangh will not formally participate in the ongoing movements concerning the Kashi (Gyanvapi mosque) and Mathura (Shahi Idgah mosque) disputes. However, he emphasized that this organizational stance does not preclude individual swayamsewaks (volunteers) from participating in these movements if they choose to do so, underscoring a nuanced position that balances organizational strategy with personal belief.

Addressing a gathering, Bhagwat drew a distinct parallel with the Ayodhya Ram Temple movement, which culminated in the Supreme Court's landmark verdict and the subsequent construction of the temple.

He noted that the Sangh had been deeply involved in the Ayodhya movement, which was a specific historical context. Following the resolution of Ayodhya, Bhagwat asserted that the RSS's role regarding similar disputes would evolve, prioritizing national unity and adherence to constitutional and legal processes.

The RSS chief articulated a preference for resolving such contentious issues through mutual understanding, dialogue, and consensus-building.

He reiterated the Sangh's long-standing position that matters of faith, when they become points of contention, are best addressed through peaceful means or within the framework of the law, rather than through aggressive organizational agitation. The focus, he suggested, should be on fostering harmony and collective progress for the nation, rather than reopening old wounds that could lead to societal division.

While the organization itself will maintain a distance from direct involvement in the Kashi and Mathura movements, Bhagwat's statement clearly empowers individual swayamsewaks.

He clarified that their personal faith, convictions, and desire to participate in these causes will not be hindered by the Sangh's official stance. This allows for a degree of flexibility, enabling volunteers to act on their beliefs while ensuring the RSS as an institution remains focused on its broader nation-building agenda and cultural work.

This declaration from the top leadership of the RSS signals a strategic shift, reflecting a post-Ayodhya approach where the organization seeks to project itself as a unifier and a proponent of constitutional methods.

It aims to prevent the RSS from being perceived as directly fueling every religious dispute, while still acknowledging and respecting the deeply held sentiments of its vast network of volunteers regarding these sensitive issues.