Quebec Premier Lashes Out: Doctors Accused of 'Holding Population Hostage' Amidst Healthcare Stalemate
Share- Nishadil
- September 26, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 3 Views

Quebec's healthcare system is once again at the center of a political firestorm, as Premier François Legault unleashed a scathing critique against family doctors, accusing them of "holding students and the population hostage." The explosive remarks come in the wake of doctors' rejection of a government ultimatum regarding the integration of medical residents and the broader issue of patient access to primary care.
Premier Legault's frustration was palpable as he addressed reporters, pointing a direct finger at the Quebec Federation of General Practitioners (FMOQ).
"They're holding medical students hostage by refusing to take them in, and they're holding the population hostage by refusing to take on new patients," Legault asserted, emphasizing his belief that the FMOQ prioritizes its own interests over the pressing needs of Quebecers. He linked the doctors' resistance to their refusal to negotiate with the government outside the confines of their federation.
At the heart of this escalating dispute is the government's ambitious drive to improve access to family doctors, a long-standing challenge for the province.
The Legault administration proposed an ultimatum: force medical residents to dedicate 40% of their training to family medicine, aiming to significantly bolster the ranks of general practitioners. However, this proposal was met with a resounding rejection from the FMOQ, setting the stage for the current high-stakes confrontation.
Health Minister Christian Dubé, standing firmly beside the Premier, echoed the sentiment of disappointment and revealed the government's next move.
Dubé announced the imminent introduction of Bill 15, a legislative hammer designed to bypass the FMOQ's resistance. This new bill would grant medical residents a permanent license upon graduation, allowing them to practice independently even if they haven't secured a placement in a traditional clinic.
The move is widely seen as a strategic pressure tactic, aiming to compel family doctors to integrate more residents by creating an alternative pathway for new practitioners.
The FMOQ, however, vehemently denies the Premier's accusations, dismissing them as a "media attack." Dr. Marc-André Amyot, president of the federation, maintained that family doctors are indeed taking on residents, but they simply refuse to be dictated to by a government ultimatum.
He stressed the importance of genuine negotiation rather than unilateral decrees, suggesting that the Premier's words were an attempt to deflect attention and undermine the doctors' position.
Caught in the crossfire are the medical residents themselves, represented by the Federation of Medical Residents of Quebec (FMRQ).
While eager to contribute to the healthcare system, they find themselves in an unenviable position, wary of being used as pawns in a larger political battle. The FMRQ expressed concerns about the quality of their training if they are simply deployed without proper support and integration, and voiced fears of being forced into specific regions or types of practice against their will.
They are keen to be part of the solution, but not at the expense of their professional development or autonomy.
Legault's administration has repeatedly highlighted its efforts to support healthcare professionals, pointing to significant salary increases and substantial investments in the system.
Yet, despite these financial commitments, the Premier feels the FMOQ continues to stonewall, obstructing efforts to provide better access to care for all Quebecers. The current standoff underscores a deep-seated philosophical divide between the government's top-down approach to healthcare reform and the professional autonomy sought by the medical community, leaving the future of Quebec's primary care system hanging precariously in the balance.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on