Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Punjab Healthcare Under Scrutiny: High Court Demands Urgent ICU Audit

  • Nishadil
  • January 28, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 9 Views
Punjab Healthcare Under Scrutiny: High Court Demands Urgent ICU Audit

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders State to Detail Critical ICU Facilities in District Hospitals

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a sharp directive to the Punjab government, demanding a comprehensive report on the availability of ICU facilities, specialist staff, and vital equipment across all district hospitals within three weeks. This urgent order stems from a tragic case highlighting critical healthcare gaps and the state's constitutional obligation.

In a move that truly underscores the critical state of public health infrastructure, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has stepped in, issuing a clear and rather stern directive to the Punjab government. The court wants, and quite urgently at that, a full, detailed affidavit outlining the precise status of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) facilities across all district hospitals in the state. And when we say urgent, we mean it: they’ve given the government a mere three weeks to furnish these crucial details.

This isn't just another bureaucratic request, you see. This significant intervention by a bench comprising Justices Sureshwar Thakur and Lalit Batra was directly prompted by a deeply troubling petition. It was filed by Sukhwinder Singh, a father from Ludhiana whose son, Amritpal Singh, tragically lost his life following a train accident. The core of Mr. Singh’s plea? Allegations of profound medical negligence and, perhaps more tellingly, the shocking lack of critical care facilities.

Amritpal's story is heartbreaking. After the accident, he was initially rushed to the Civil Hospital Ludhiana. However, due to what was claimed to be an absence of an available ICU bed and the necessary specialist care, he had to be referred to a private hospital. And that's where the tragedy truly deepened: he passed away, reportedly still unable to secure the critical ICU bed he so desperately needed. One can only imagine the anguish of a family caught in such a dire situation, bouncing from one facility to another, only to face such an outcome.

The High Court, in its ruling, didn't pull any punches. It specifically instructed the state to provide an exhaustive inventory. We're talking about the exact number of ICU beds available, the roster of specialist doctors and nursing staff trained in critical care, and a complete rundown of all essential equipment required for a fully functional ICU at each district-level hospital. This isn't just about counting beds; it's about ensuring a complete ecosystem of critical care.

It's worth noting that this isn't the first time the court has had to weigh in on such matters. During the proceedings, the bench actually made reference to several similar petitions and previous orders that have highlighted persistent deficiencies in the state's medical infrastructure. This suggests a pattern, doesn't it? A recurring concern that critical healthcare provisions simply aren't meeting the mark for ordinary citizens.

The underlying principle here is profoundly important: access to adequate medical facilities, especially critical care, is not a privilege; it’s a fundamental right. The court emphasized that the state bears a constitutional obligation to ensure its citizens, regardless of their socio-economic standing, have equitable access to life-saving medical care. When public hospitals fail to provide such basic, yet truly crucial, services, it really begs the question of where our priorities lie.

So, the ball is now firmly in Punjab’s court. The government has a tight deadline to come clean on its critical care capabilities. Everyone will be watching, waiting to see what emerges from this audit, and crucially, what tangible steps will be taken next. The next hearing for this pivotal case is already set for April 22. It's a situation that truly calls for immediate and meaningful action.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on