Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Public Health at Risk? IMA Demands Withdrawal of Controversial Circular Allowing Homoeopaths to Prescribe Allopathic Drugs

  • Nishadil
  • September 10, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 9 Views
Public Health at Risk? IMA Demands Withdrawal of Controversial Circular Allowing Homoeopaths to Prescribe Allopathic Drugs

A storm is brewing in Maharashtra's medical community as the Indian Medical Association (IMA) has once again launched a scathing attack on the state government. At the heart of this renewed conflict is a contentious circular, issued on June 5, 2024, that threatens to redefine medical practice by permitting homoeopathic practitioners to prescribe allopathic medicines.

The IMA has unequivocally demanded the immediate withdrawal of this circular, warning of grave public health consequences and vowing to pursue all possible legal avenues if the government fails to comply.

This isn't the first time the Maharashtra government has attempted such a controversial move.

A remarkably similar circular, issued on August 10, 2022, faced immediate and fierce resistance from the medical fraternity, compelling its withdrawal just six days later, on August 16, 2022. The re-emergence of this policy, barely two years later, has ignited a fresh wave of outrage, with medical professionals accusing the state of a dangerous disregard for established medical protocols and patient safety.

Dr.

Anil Pachnekar, President of IMA Mumbai, minced no words in expressing the association's vehement opposition. "We strongly condemn the Maharashtra government's recent circular allowing homoeopaths to prescribe allopathic medicines. This is a hazardous decision that puts the lives of citizens at significant risk," he declared.

The core of the IMA's argument hinges on the fundamental difference in training and qualification. Homoeopaths, by virtue of their curriculum and licensing, are not equipped to understand the nuances, dosages, side effects, and contraindications of allopathic drugs. Allowing them to prescribe these powerful medications is, in the IMA's view, a recipe for medical malpractice and widespread health complications.

The circular reportedly allows homoeopaths holding a "Certificate of Competence in Modern Pharmacology" (CCMP) to administer allopathic treatments.

However, the IMA has vehemently questioned the validity and adequacy of such a certificate, arguing that a short-term course cannot compensate for years of rigorous medical education and clinical training required to safely practice allopathy. "There is no scientific basis or legal precedent for such a certificate to qualify someone to practice an entirely different system of medicine," stated Dr.

Mangesh Pate, Secretary of IMA Maharashtra.

The IMA's stance is further bolstered by a series of landmark judgments from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. These rulings have consistently upheld the principle that practitioners of one system of medicine cannot legally or ethically practice another system without proper qualification.

The IMA warns that the state government is not only jeopardizing public health but also acting in direct contravention of these judicial pronouncements. They highlight that mixing of systems leads to 'quackery' and undermines the integrity of both medical disciplines.

Critics suggest that such policies might be a misguided attempt to address the shortage of doctors, particularly in rural and remote areas.

However, the IMA firmly asserts that diluting medical standards is not the solution. Instead, they advocate for robust policies that increase the number of fully qualified allopathic doctors and improve healthcare infrastructure. Allowing inadequately trained individuals to administer complex allopathic drugs will only exacerbate health crises rather than solve them, leading to misdiagnoses, inappropriate treatments, and adverse drug reactions.

The IMA has issued a stern warning: if the circular is not withdrawn immediately, they will not hesitate to take strong legal action, including filing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to safeguard the health and well-being of the state's citizens.

The medical community stands united in its resolve to prevent what it perceives as a catastrophic erosion of medical standards. This ongoing battle between the medical fraternity and the government underscores a critical debate about healthcare policy, professional boundaries, and the paramount importance of patient safety in Maharashtra.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on