Psychologists Raise Alarming Questions About Donald Trump's Cognitive Health

A storm of speculation is brewing around the cognitive health of former President Donald Trump, ignited by prominent psychologists who have publicly voiced their concerns. At the heart of this discussion is Dr. John Gartner, a renowned psychologist and former Johns Hopkins University professor, who has drawn alarming parallels between Trump's recent public appearances and the symptoms associated with frontotemporal dementia (FTD).

Dr.

Gartner's assertions are not made in isolation. He refers to a "consensus statement" from a group of mental health professionals who have observed what they describe as a noticeable decline in Trump's cognitive functions and a marked shift in his personality. This collective concern points to a pattern of verbal slips, apparent memory lapses, and a general impression of reduced sharpness that, to these experts, warrants serious attention.

Among the specific instances cited by Gartner and his colleagues are several high-profile gaffes.

These include Trump reportedly misremembering the name of his own doctor, referring to him as "Ronny Johnson" instead of Ronny Jackson. Another prominent example often brought up is the so-called "person, woman, man, camera, TV" cognitive test recitation, which, while presented by Trump as evidence of his mental acuity, has been scrutinized by medical professionals as potentially indicative of different issues.

The psychologists also highlight what they perceive as a stark contrast between Trump's current public persona and his demeanor during his earlier political career.

They suggest that the energetic, often unpredictable but coherent figure of 2016 has evolved into someone exhibiting more pronounced cognitive inconsistencies. This alleged change in verbal fluency, reasoning, and even personality traits is a key factor in their analysis, leading them to consider the possibility of neurological deterioration.

Dr.

Gartner is not alone in these apprehensions. Dr. Lance Dodes, a former assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, has publicly echoed these concerns, reinforcing the notion that Trump's public behavior suggests significant cognitive challenges. This convergence of professional opinions lends weight to the debate, pushing it beyond mere political rhetoric into the realm of medical observation.

However, these public diagnoses are not without controversy.

Mental health professionals are typically bound by the "Goldwater Rule," an ethical guideline stating that it is unethical for psychiatrists to offer a professional opinion about the mental state of public figures whom they have not personally examined. This rule is designed to prevent speculative diagnoses and maintain professional integrity.

Despite the Goldwater Rule, a counter-argument often arises: the "duty to warn." This principle suggests that if mental health professionals believe a public figure's cognitive state poses a potential danger to the public or the nation, they have an ethical obligation to voice their concerns, even without direct examination.

This creates a significant ethical tightrope walk for experts observing such high-profile individuals.

As the 2024 election cycle intensifies, these discussions about Donald Trump's cognitive health are likely to remain a prominent and contentious topic. While no definitive diagnosis can be made without direct medical evaluation, the persistent and public concerns raised by esteemed psychologists underscore the gravity of their observations and the profound implications for leadership.