Political Firestorm Erupts: Demand for Karnataka CM's Suspension Over Teacher Controversy

A political tempest is brewing in Karnataka, with former minister V Sunil Kumar unleashing a scathing attack on the state government. His fiery condemnation targets the recent suspension of government school teachers in Gadag, who were reportedly penalized for a seemingly innocuous act: asking students about the 'Modi guarantee' schemes.

Kumar didn't mince words, declaring unequivocally that it is the Chief Minister and the Education Minister who should face suspension, not the dedicated educators caught in the political crossfire.

This bold demand comes amidst allegations that the teachers were suspended after inquiring whether students had benefited from the central government's 'Modi guarantee' initiatives.

The senior leader passionately argued that if teachers are indeed compelled to pose such questions, the blame squarely lies with the state's top leadership.

"If teachers are asking students about 'Modi guarantee' schemes, it indicates a significant lapse in the directives and governance from the Chief Minister and the Education Minister," Kumar asserted, suggesting that such directives, if they exist, emanate from the highest echelons of power.

He further escalated his criticism, accusing the Chief Minister and his cabinet colleagues of blatantly misusing the government machinery for their political agenda.

Kumar highlighted a disturbing pattern, recalling previous instances where officials were allegedly pressured to collect data related to the state government's own guarantee schemes, blurring the lines between administration and political campaigning.

Kumar questioned the glaring double standards at play: "Ministers freely campaign, utilizing government platforms and resources to promote their schemes.

Yet, when teachers, perhaps in an attempt to understand public perception or as a misguided directive, ask about central government schemes, they are instantly suspended. This is an egregious example of hypocrisy and scapegoating," he stated, pointing out the stark disparity in treatment.

The former minister emphasized that if the government views these inquiries as a violation of conduct, then the principal violators are those at the helm, who set the tone and direction for the administration.

He portrayed the teachers as innocent pawns caught in a larger political game, suffering consequences for actions that, by his logic, originate from the top.

This incident, according to Kumar, is not just about a few suspended teachers; it's a symptom of a deeper malaise—the politicization of bureaucracy and the erosion of ethical governance.

His strong stance has undoubtedly fueled the ongoing political discourse in Karnataka, turning the spotlight onto the Chief Minister and demanding immediate accountability for the actions taken against the teaching community. The controversy continues to unfold, leaving many to question the true motives behind the suspensions and the fairness of the system.