Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Pittsburgh's Defensive Depth: A Right-Handed Conundrum for the Penguins

  • Nishadil
  • September 17, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 2 Views
Pittsburgh's Defensive Depth: A Right-Handed Conundrum for the Penguins

The Pittsburgh Penguins find themselves in a fascinating, if somewhat challenging, predicament: an embarrassment of riches on the right side of their defensive corps. With perennial Norris Trophy contender Erik Karlsson joining veteran stalwarts Kris Letang and Jeff Petry, the team boasts an unprecedented collection of high-caliber right-shot defensemen.

While depth is often a luxury, this particular imbalance presents a unique strategic puzzle for General Manager Kyle Dubas and the coaching staff.

Historically, NHL teams strive for balance, ideally deploying two left-shot and two right-shot defensemen across their top two pairings. This allows players to receive passes on their forehand along the boards and optimize their shooting lanes from the point.

The Penguins, however, are now overflowing with talent on one side, raising pertinent questions about defensive pairings, roster construction, and potential future moves.

At the heart of the right-handed glut are Kris Letang, Erik Karlsson, and Jeff Petry. Letang remains the undisputed leader of the Penguins' blue line, a dynamic offensive force and a stalwart presence.

Karlsson, acquired in a blockbuster trade, is one of the most gifted offensive defensemen in NHL history, though his defensive game has been scrutinized. Petry, a veteran with significant experience, brings a solid two-way game and a physical edge. Beyond these three, players like Chad Ruhwedel also contribute as reliable right-shot options, deepening the pool even further.

This abundance forces Dubas to consider several strategic avenues.

One immediate thought is the feasibility of playing a right-shot defenseman on their off-side (the left). While some players, including Karlsson at times, have shown capability in this role, it's rarely ideal. Playing on the off-side can hinder puck retrieval along the boards, complicate breakouts, and limit one-timers from the point, potentially stifling a defenseman's natural offensive instincts and defensive effectiveness.

Finding the right player who can comfortably and effectively make this transition is crucial, but not guaranteed.

Another, perhaps more likely, solution involves roster adjustments. With multiple high-value right-shot defensemen, trade discussions become an inevitable topic. While trading a player of Karlsson or Letang's caliber seems improbable given their impact and contracts, Jeff Petry could emerge as a more plausible candidate for a move.

A trade involving Petry, or even a player like Ruhwedel, could serve multiple purposes: balancing the defensive corps, freeing up cap space, and potentially acquiring a much-needed left-shot defenseman or a forward to address other roster needs. However, finding the right trade partner and fair value is always a challenge, especially with contracts involved.

The Penguins' coaching staff will also grapple with optimizing their defensive pairings.

Experimenting with combinations that maximize individual strengths while minimizing the drawbacks of the RHD surplus will be a priority. Could we see a top pairing of two righties if one is comfortable on the left? Or will the team prioritize traditional pairings, leading to difficult decisions about who sits or who is moved?

Ultimately, this isn't a problem of lacking talent; it's a challenge of managing an embarrassment of riches.

Kyle Dubas's task is to leverage this depth into a competitive advantage, whether through creative on-ice deployment, shrewd trades, or a combination of both. The decisions made regarding the Penguins' right-handed defensemen will undoubtedly shape their trajectory in the quest for another Stanley Cup, making this one of the most intriguing roster puzzles in the league.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on