Pathaan AD Blasts War 2: Is YRF's Spy Universe Running on Fumes?
Share- Nishadil
- August 18, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 1 minutes read
- 7 Views

The world of Indian cinema's spy thrillers just got a jolt, not from an explosive action sequence, but from a candid, unfiltered critique. Shahnawaz Ali, an assistant director who played a key role in Shah Rukh Khan's blockbuster Pathaan, has ignited a fiery debate within the YRF Spy Universe fandom, publicly tearing down the much-anticipated War 2.
Ali didn't mince words, delivering a scathing assessment that has since gone viral. He unequivocally declared War 2 as the 'weakest film of the Spy Universe,' a statement bound to ruffle feathers among its creators and fans alike. His specific criticisms painted a grim picture: a 'mid first half' followed by what he bluntly called a 'garbage second half.' This isn't just casual commentary; it's a direct challenge to the film's narrative and execution, suggesting a reliance on hype rather than substance.
Further elaborating on his disappointment, Ali didn't stop at War 2. He also included Tiger 3 in his critical sweep, dismissing it as another weak link in the franchise. For him, the gold standard remains 2019's War, praising its impactful action sequences and original story. Unsurprisingly, he held Pathaan in high regard, commending its engaging plot and character development, particularly after the perceived dip in quality with Tiger 3.
This bold stance from someone intimately involved in the production of one of the Spy Universe's most successful entries has sent ripples across social media. Fans are now engaged in fervent discussions, weighing in on Ali's critique and debating whether the Spy Universe is indeed faltering or if this is merely a subjective take. One thing is certain: Shahnawaz Ali's unfiltered opinion has added an unexpected layer of intrigue and controversy to the narrative surrounding YRF's ambitious cinematic world.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on