Passkeys: The Future of Security, But Not Without Peril
Share- Nishadil
- September 20, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 2 Views

For years, the internet has groaned under the weight of passwords—those flimsy, forgettable chains of characters that serve as the weakest link in our digital security. Then came passkeys, heralded as the revolutionary solution, promising a future free from phishing and credential theft. A world where logging in is seamless, secure, and password-free.
But what if this shimmering promise holds a hidden flaw, a crack in the foundation that advanced attackers could exploit?
Recent revelations from security researcher Marcelo Jabur have cast a shadow of concern over the passkey paradigm. While passkeys are undeniably a leap forward in user authentication, Jabur demonstrated a theoretical, yet deeply unsettling, method for compromise.
This isn't about phishing a passkey itself, but rather about a sophisticated attack that could allow a threat actor to effectively "steal" an account during the passkey creation process, even if the victim is physically present and believes they are creating a passkey for their own device.
The core of this vulnerability lies in the 'attestation' phase – the moment your device cryptographically proves its identity to the service you're trying to access.
Imagine this scenario: a highly persistent attacker manages to gain significant control over your device, perhaps through advanced malware or root access. At the precise moment you initiate a passkey creation for a new service, this attacker could intercept the communication. Instead of your device attesting its identity and generating a passkey linked to your hardware, the malicious software could trick the system into linking the passkey to the attacker's device.
The result? The attacker now possesses a legitimate passkey for your account, allowing them unfettered access, without ever touching your physical device again.
It's crucial to understand the high bar for such an attack. This isn't a simple hack; it requires an attacker to already have deep, privileged access to your device.
This isn't your average phishing scam. However, in an era of increasingly sophisticated malware and supply chain attacks, such scenarios, while rare, are not beyond the realm of possibility for determined adversaries targeting high-value individuals or organizations.
The FIDO Alliance, the consortium behind the passkey standard, acknowledges this theoretical risk.
They emphasize that while their protocol is robust, the ultimate security of passkeys relies heavily on the underlying security of the device itself. If your device is compromised at such a fundamental level, no authentication method, no matter how advanced, can guarantee absolute safety. This serves as a stark reminder: device security isn't just a recommendation; it's a critical prerequisite for all digital interactions.
So, what does this mean for you, the everyday user embracing the passkey revolution? It’s not a call to abandon passkeys—they remain vastly superior to traditional passwords in combating prevalent threats like phishing.
Instead, it's a call to heightened vigilance and proactive security measures. Keep your operating system and applications updated. Employ robust antivirus and anti-malware solutions. Be wary of suspicious links or downloads that could pave the way for device compromise. For developers and platform providers, it's a prompt to explore additional layers of defense, perhaps by integrating more robust device integrity checks or multi-factor authentication even with passkeys for high-risk transactions.
Passkeys represent a monumental stride towards a more secure digital landscape.
But like any powerful technology, they come with nuances and potential vectors for attack that demand our collective attention. This discovery isn't a death knell for passkeys, but rather a vital opportunity for refinement and reinforcement, ensuring that our passwordless future is not only convenient but truly secure.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on