OSBE Members Stand Firm: Demand Urgent Meeting with Supt. Walters Amidst Executive Order Controversy

Oklahoma's educational landscape is simmering with tension as members of the State Board of Education (OSBE) are emphatically demanding an urgent post-meeting with State Superintendent Ryan Walters. The demand comes hot on the heels of Walters' controversial executive order approving the nation's first publicly funded religious charter school, an issue that has not only raised eyebrows but also ignited a fierce debate over authority, transparency, and the separation of church and state.

The board's collective frustration reached a boiling point after Walters abruptly cancelled a previously scheduled meeting, a move many perceived as a deliberate attempt to sidestep a direct confrontation regarding the executive order.

OSBE members, refusing to be silenced, have made it clear they are "not playing games," underscoring their commitment to their constitutional duties and the integrity of the state's education system.

At the heart of the dispute is St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School. The OSBE had already reviewed and decisively rejected the application for this religious charter school, citing serious concerns about its legality and constitutionality.

However, Superintendent Walters, seemingly undeterred by the board's vote, moved unilaterally to approve it via an executive order, effectively circumventing the established governance process.

Board members have voiced deep concern that Walters' actions are systematically undermining the board's authority and its crucial role in overseeing public education.

They argue that such unilateral decisions set a dangerous precedent, eroding the collaborative spirit and democratic processes essential for effective governance. The sentiment among members is one of being disrespected and having their expertise disregarded.

Further complicating matters, Oklahoma's Attorney General has openly questioned the legality of Walters' executive order, adding a significant legal cloud over the superintendent's decision.

This legal uncertainty only strengthens the board's resolve to convene a proper meeting, demanding a thorough discussion and clarification on a matter with such profound implications for public education and constitutional law.

The OSBE members are advocating for a return to proper procedure, emphasizing the need for open dialogue and collective decision-making.

They seek to address not just the immediate issue of the religious charter school but also the broader implications of the superintendent's perceived attempts to centralize power and bypass the board. Their demand for a meeting is a clear message: the board intends to fulfill its responsibilities, hold the superintendent accountable, and ensure transparency in all decisions impacting Oklahoma's students and schools.