Operation Gothic Serpent Under Fire: $50 Million Lawsuit Challenges Trump Admin's Immigration Tactics
Share- Nishadil
- September 27, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 0 Views

The predawn hours of June 5, 2018, shattered the quiet calm of Salem and Massillon, Ohio, as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) launched "Operation Gothic Serpent." In a coordinated, sweeping action, federal agents descended upon Fresh Mark meatpacking plants, initiating one of the largest workplace immigration raids in over a decade.
What followed, according to an explosive $50 million federal lawsuit, was a harrowing experience of alleged civil rights abuses, racial profiling, and unlawful detention, leaving a trail of broken families and profound injustice.
Filed in August 2018 in the Northern District of Ohio, this landmark lawsuit targets the Trump administration, ICE, and the Department of Homeland Security.
Led by a coalition of powerhouse civil rights advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the ACLU of Ohio, and the Legal Aid Society of Cleveland, the suit seeks not only substantial financial compensation for the victims but also a powerful message against what they describe as a pattern of unconstitutional immigration enforcement.
The heart of the lawsuit's claims revolves around alleged systematic violations of fundamental rights.
Eyewitness accounts and legal filings paint a grim picture: agents reportedly targeted individuals based on their perceived ethnicity, rounding up nearly 150 workers, predominantly Guatemalan immigrants. Many were legal residents or had no criminal record, yet they were allegedly subjected to aggressive questioning without legal counsel, held for hours, and coerced into signing documents they didn't understand, often in English, a language many did not speak.
Furthermore, the lawsuit details instances of unlawful searches and seizures, where agents allegedly entered homes without warrants, infringing upon Fourth Amendment protections.
Crucially, the plaintiffs argue that detainees were denied immediate access to attorneys, a cornerstone of due process under the Fifth Amendment, effectively isolating them and undermining their ability to challenge their detention or potential deportation.
The human toll of Operation Gothic Serpent has been devastating.
Families were torn apart, with parents separated from their children, many of whom are U.S. citizens. The sudden loss of income left communities reeling, deepening economic hardship. The emotional and psychological scars run deep, as individuals recount terrifying experiences of fear, uncertainty, and a profound sense of betrayal by a system meant to uphold justice.
This raid was not an isolated incident but a stark manifestation of the Trump administration’s "zero tolerance" immigration policies.
It underscored a significant shift towards more aggressive enforcement tactics, often prioritizing mass arrests and deportations, regardless of individual circumstances or community impact. The lawsuit serves as a critical challenge to these policies, questioning their legality and humanity in the face of constitutional guarantees.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the $50 million lawsuit against the Trump administration stands as a crucial battleground for civil liberties.
It seeks to hold federal agencies accountable for alleged abuses of power, providing a voice for those directly impacted by the raids and sending a powerful message about the imperative of upholding constitutional rights for all, regardless of immigration status. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for future immigration enforcement and the protection of fundamental human rights in the United States.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on