OpenAI Responds to New York Times Lawsuit, Claims Paper “Intentionally Manipulated” Prompts

OpenAI is firing back at after the company was sued for copyright infringement over the use of the publisher’s articles to train its artificial intelligence chatbot. In a blog , the Sam Altman led firm said that the is “not telling the full story” and claimed it “intentionally manipulated” prompts to make it appears as if ChatGPT generates near word for word excerpts of articles.

“Even when using such prompts, our models don’t typically behave the way The New York Times insinuates, which suggests they either instructed the model to regurgitate or cherry picked their examples from many attempts,” the post states. OpenAI maintained that such verbatim regurgitation is a “rare bug.” There are guardrails in place to limit “inadvertent memorization,” added the company, which stressed that users are barred under its terms of use from prompting models to produce answers that may violate intellectual property rights.

The blog was issued in response to the last month over novel copyright issues raised by generative AI in a suit that could have far reaching implications on the news publishing industry. The publisher presented of products from OpenAI and Microsoft displaying near word for word excerpts of articles when prompted, which allegedly go far beyond the snippets of texts typically shown with ordinary search results.

One example: Bing Chat copied all but two of the first 396 words of its 2023 article “The Secrets Hamas knew about Israel’s Military.” An exhibit shows 100 other situations in which OpenAI’s GPT was trained on and memorized articles from The . In the post, OpenAI argued that training AI models using the publisher’s articles and other “publicly available internet materials” is fair use.

THR Newsletters Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day More from The Hollywood Reporter.