Nova Scotia Power's Unreliable Reign: Eighth Consecutive Year of Failed Standards Sparks Outrage Amidst Rate Hike Demands
Share- Nishadil
- September 11, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 7 Views

For an astonishing eighth consecutive year, Nova Scotia Power (NSP) has fallen short of its mandated reliability standards, a consistent underperformance that continues to draw sharp criticism from regulators, consumer advocates, and the public alike. This troubling pattern persists even as the utility, which enjoys a comfortable 8.75% allowable rate of return for its shareholders, continues to press for further rate increases, fueling widespread frustration.
The latest report from the provincial Utility and Review Board (UARB), informed by an independent analysis from Liberty Consulting Group, painted a stark picture of a utility struggling to keep the lights on for its customers.
The findings unequivocally state that NSP's performance metrics have not only failed to improve but have actively deteriorated over the past decade, a period during which the province has endured a string of increasingly severe weather events.
NSP attributes its persistent struggles primarily to the escalating frequency and intensity of hurricanes, tropical storms, and other extreme weather phenomena.
The company argues that these events place immense strain on an aging infrastructure, necessitating substantial, ongoing investments to modernize and harden the grid. They maintain that significant capital is being channeled into these improvements, promising a more resilient network for the future.
However, these explanations offer little solace to a populace weary of power outages and increasingly skeptical of the utility's commitments.
Critics, including prominent consumer advocate Bill Mahody, point to the fundamental disconnect: NSP is permitted a generous rate of return for its shareholders, a return that, in theory, should be directly linked to its service quality and reliability. The ongoing failures, therefore, suggest a system where the utility is being financially rewarded despite consistently failing to deliver on a core promise.
The UARB, as the province's regulatory body, faces the delicate task of balancing the utility's financial needs with its responsibility to ensure reliable and affordable service for Nova Scotians.
The board's consistent reports of underperformance highlight a significant challenge in achieving this balance. Even the province's energy minister has publicly expressed concern over NSP's inability to meet these crucial standards, reflecting the broader public dissatisfaction.
The consequences of this prolonged unreliability are far-reaching.
Businesses suffer lost revenue due to disruptions, essential services are impacted, and residents face inconvenience, discomfort, and even safety concerns. As Nova Scotia grapples with an evolving climate and the need for a robust energy infrastructure, the ongoing reliability failures of Nova Scotia Power remain a critical issue demanding immediate and effective solutions, rather than just promises of future improvements.
.- Canada
- Business
- News
- Politics
- Technology
- LocalNews
- BusinessNews
- WorldNews
- BreakingNews
- PoliticsNews
- SportsNews
- Environment
- UsNews
- NationalNews
- Economy
- Travel
- Manitoba
- Education
- Lifestyle
- Quebec
- Government
- PoliticalNews
- Ontario
- BritishColumbia
- Photos
- NewBrunswick
- NovaScotia
- PowerOutages
- CanadaNews
- Alberta
- FederalGovernment
- CanadaTrafficCanadaWeather
- Yukon
- ForeignNews
- CanadianNews
- ArtsNews
- CanadianBreakingNews
- Trudeau
- CanadaSportsNews
- PoliticalOpinion
- LifeNews
- GlobeAndMailCanadaNews
- GlobeAndMail
- GlobeAndMailBreakingNews
- BreakingNewsVideo
- Pei
- Nunavut
- NorthwestTerritories
- NewfoundlandAndLabrador
- CanadaSports
- InfrastructureInvestment
- ConsumerAdvocacy
- EnergyRegulation
- NovaScotiaPower
- Nsp
- ElectricityReliability
- UtilityStandards
- Uarb
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on