Next-Gen GPU Dreams Dashed? Leaked Delays Could Push RTX 60 and RDNA 5 Far into the Future!
Share- Nishadil
- November 26, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 5 minutes read
- 1 Views
Oh, the perpetual dance of anticipation in the tech world! Just when we start getting excited about what’s next, especially in the realm of bleeding-edge graphics cards, a fresh rumor swoops in to temper our expectations. And this time, it's not just a minor hiccup; we're talking about a potentially significant shift in the GPU landscape, suggesting that the very next next-gen cards from both Nvidia and AMD might be quite a long way off indeed.
The whispers come courtesy of Kopite7kimi, a leaker with a remarkably solid track record when it comes to predicting GPU movements. If their latest insights prove accurate, then PC builders and gamers eagerly awaiting the true successors to our current high-end cards might need to buckle up for a much longer wait than initially hoped. It seems the future of gaming graphics, particularly the generation after the immediate next one, is being pushed further and further down the road.
Let's talk Nvidia first, shall we? We've all been keenly watching for the "Blackwell" generation, which we anticipate will be marketed as the RTX 50 series. Initial murmurs suggested a late 2024 arrival, perhaps just in time for the holiday shopping frenzy. However, Kopite7kimi’s latest intel points more firmly towards an early 2025 launch. A few months' difference? Annoying, perhaps, but not exactly catastrophic, right? But here’s where it gets interesting – and potentially frustrating for enthusiasts. The generation after Blackwell, tentatively dubbed "Blackwell-Next" (and which we can reasonably assume would be the RTX 60 series), is reportedly facing a much more substantial delay. We’re now looking at a potential release window of late 2026, or even stretching into 2027. Yes, you read that correctly: 2027 for the RTX 60 series. That's a significant leap from the typical two-year refresh cycle we've grown accustomed to.
And what about team red, AMD? Their current-gen RDNA 3 architecture (think RX 7000 series) is well established, and we’re expecting the RDNA 4 generation (likely the RX 8000 series) to debut sometime in 2024. Good news there, as the leaker hasn't indicated any major deviation from that timeline, so we can still look forward to those cards relatively soon. However, just like Nvidia's "Blackwell-Next," AMD's next next-gen, the RDNA 5 series, appears to be staring down the barrel of a similar delay. The latest information suggests that RDNA 5 might also be pushed back to 2027. So, whether you bleed green or red, the very cutting edge of GPU technology seems destined for a longer incubation period.
Why these delays? The leak itself doesn't offer explicit reasons, leaving us to speculate a bit, which is half the fun (and frustration!) of following these things. It could be a myriad of factors. Perhaps the current inventory of existing GPUs is still a bit high, and manufacturers want to clear stock before unleashing new generations. Or maybe the complexities of designing and manufacturing these increasingly powerful chips are simply taking longer than anticipated. We've also seen a massive pivot towards AI accelerators from both companies, which could be diverting resources and focus away from consumer gaming GPUs. Whatever the reason, this prolonged wait could significantly impact how often gamers and professionals upgrade their rigs, and certainly changes the expected cadence of GPU releases we’ve become used to.
For now, it seems the immediate future holds the RTX 50 series and RDNA 4 cards. But beyond that? Well, it looks like we’ll all be settling in for a much longer journey with those generations before the true "next next-gen" makes its grand entrance. It’s certainly a development that changes the narrative for the coming years in the graphics card market, asking us to be just a little bit more patient for those truly groundbreaking advancements.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on