Mumbai's Air Woes: High Court Says It's Local Factors, Not a Far-Off Volcano
Share- Nishadil
- November 28, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 0 Views
Well, that's one theory definitively put to rest! The Bombay High Court recently delivered a rather straightforward verdict regarding Mumbai's stubbornly persistent air pollution: it's not, contrary to one petition's claims, caused by a far-flung Ethiopian volcano. Instead, the court didn't mince words, pointing squarely to the culprits much closer to home.
Justices Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Kamal Khata heard a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that rather ambitiously suggested the culprit behind Mumbai’s smoggy skies was the Erta Ale volcano in Ethiopia. However, the bench found the entire premise "misconceived" and, quite frankly, "totally baseless." It seems common sense, and a bit of local observation, prevailed in the courtroom.
The judges were pretty clear: the real drivers of Mumbai's deteriorating air quality are well-known, tangible, and very much within the city's own boundaries. We're talking about the relentless construction boom, the sheer volume of vehicles choking the roads, the ever-present industrial emissions, and, let's not forget, the pervasive road dust that seems to settle on everything. These, the court asserted, are the undeniable local factors at play, not some distant geological event thousands of miles away.
It turns out the petitioner's evidence was, to put it mildly, rather thin. They reportedly relied on a single "newspaper report" from way back in 2022, which had mentioned a plume of smoke or ash potentially reaching India from the Ethiopian volcano. But as the judges wisely highlighted, that report was from 2022. The petition itself, on the other hand, was filed in response to the recent and ongoing high levels of pollution plaguing Mumbai – a crucial distinction, wouldn't you say?
Crucially, the court noted that absolutely no scientific data or expert analysis was presented to back up the fantastical volcano theory. When making such extraordinary claims, especially concerning public health and environmental issues, one would expect a bit more than just an old news clipping, right? It underscores the importance of proper scientific research when attempting to explain complex phenomena like air pollution.
And for those wondering, this isn't the only air pollution battle the High Court is currently engaged in. The bench is already actively hearing another PIL on Mumbai's air quality, filed by Abhijit Mestry, and has actually issued clear directives to various state and civic bodies, urging them to implement concrete measures to tackle the crisis. So, while one far-fetched theory has been politely but firmly dismissed, the broader fight for cleaner air in Mumbai continues, very much focused on the immediate and local challenges.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on