Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Monstrous: When Fictional Monster Politicians Are More Principled Than Reality

  • Nishadil
  • February 21, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 11 Views
Monstrous: When Fictional Monster Politicians Are More Principled Than Reality

Forget Reality: A New Game Features Monster Politicians Who Are Somehow Less Evil Than the Real Deal

Whitethorn Games is launching "Monstrous," a satirical deck-building narrative game where you play as a monster running for office. The clever twist? These literal monsters might just be more ethical than actual human politicians.

Okay, let's just lay it all out there. In a world that often feels like a political horror show, sometimes you just need a good laugh, right? And maybe, just maybe, a game that puts literal monsters in positions of power, only to reveal they're somehow... well, less monstrous than what we're used to, is exactly what the doctor ordered. Enter "Monstrous," a new title from the folks at Whitethorn Games that's quickly capturing attention for its biting, if darkly humorous, premise.

Picture this: you're a monster. Not in the metaphorical sense, mind you, but a genuine, honest-to-goodness ghoul, or maybe a shadowy creature of the night. And your job? To win an election. "Monstrous" isn't just another game; it's a narrative-driven, deck-building experience that plunges you headfirst into the chaotic, often absurd, world of campaigning. You'll be making promises, dealing with tricky constituents, and generally trying to keep your head (or whatever monstrous equivalent you have) above water in the treacherous political landscape.

But here's the real gut-punch, the clever bit that makes this game resonate so deeply: the core joke. The article it's inspired by really hit the nail on the head – these fictional, monstrous politicians are, by many accounts, portrayed as less evil, less corrupt, and perhaps even more principled than some of the actual human beings currently holding office. It’s a satire, plain and simple, and it cuts right to the heart of our collective disillusionment with the political process. You get to play as a monster, but the real monsters, the ones with genuine malice, might just be lurking in our news feeds.

Gameplay-wise, expect to flex those strategic muscles. As you build your deck, you'll be choosing dialogue options, managing your resources (think campaign funds and public support), and navigating tough decisions that could make or break your run for office. It's not just about winning; it's about how you win, or perhaps more poignantly, what you're willing to sacrifice to get there. Will you uphold your monstrous integrity, or will you succumb to the temptations of political expediency? The game invites you to ponder these questions, albeit with a chuckle.

And the visuals? They're just delightful. Whitethorn Games has opted for a "creepy-cute" aesthetic, bringing these monstrous candidates to life with a whimsical yet sharp art style that perfectly complements the game's satirical tone. It’s a world that’s bizarre and charming all at once, making the sharp commentary even more palatable. You can almost feel the dry wit oozing from every character design and environmental detail.

Ultimately, "Monstrous" isn't just a game; it's a commentary. It's a mirror held up to society, reflecting back the often-grotesque reality of modern politics through a fantastical, monstrous lens. For anyone who's ever sighed at a headline or rolled their eyes at a political soundbite, this game offers a cathartic escape – and maybe, just maybe, a tiny glimmer of hope that even monsters can be, well, a little less monstrous. Keep an eye out for it in 2025; it’s slated for PC, Switch, Xbox, and PlayStation. Could be just the political breath of fresh air we didn't know we needed.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on