Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Manoj Bajpayee Sets the Record Straight on 'Ghooskhor Pandat' Row: "It's About Corruption, Not Community"

  • Nishadil
  • February 07, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 8 Views
Manoj Bajpayee Sets the Record Straight on 'Ghooskhor Pandat' Row: "It's About Corruption, Not Community"

Actor Manoj Bajpayee Clarifies Controversial 'Ghooskhor Pandat' Remark, Emphasizing Focus on Corruption

Actor Manoj Bajpayee addresses the recent controversy surrounding his 'Ghooskhor Pandat' comment, asserting that his remarks were directed squarely at corrupt individuals, not any specific community or religion. He clarifies the film's overarching message.

In the bustling world of cinema, sometimes a single phrase can ignite a wildfire of discussion, even misunderstanding. Such has been the case recently with acclaimed actor Manoj Bajpayee, who found himself at the center of a swirling controversy following a particular line – 'Ghooskhor Pandat' (bribe-taking Brahmin/priest) – uttered in an interview promoting his latest work. Naturally, this sparked quite a debate, prompting the thoughtful actor to step forward and offer a much-needed clarification.

It seems the comment, initially perceived by some as a direct jab at a specific community, was, in fact, entirely misinterpreted. Bajpayee, known for his nuanced portrayals and grounded perspectives, was quick to explain his intent. He passionately stated that his remarks were never, not even for a moment, meant to target any particular religion or caste. Instead, he underscored that the phrase was aimed squarely at individuals who engage in bribery and corruption, regardless of their background or the community they belong to. You see, the focus was always on the corrupt act itself, not the identity of the person committing it.

He articulated, with a sense of conviction, that his work, especially in this context, is about exposing the pervasive issue of corruption in our society. The 'Pandat' mentioned in the context, he clarified, wasn't about a religious identity but rather a descriptor for someone in a position where they might, unfortunately, succumb to taking bribes. It's a common trap to latch onto a single word and lose sight of the broader message, isn't it?

Indeed, Bajpayee urged everyone to view the situation within the larger narrative of the film. The core message, he insisted, is a potent one against bribery and unethical practices. It’s a film, after all, that seeks to hold a mirror up to society's failings, and corruption, let's be honest, is a widespread malaise that knows no communal bounds. His intention, he made abundantly clear, was always to critique a societal ill, not to cast aspersions on an entire group of people.

Adding weight to Bajpayee's earnest explanation, director Vinod Bhanushali also chimed in, echoing the sentiment. He firmly stated that the film's message is universal and anti-corruption at its heart. He emphasized that the film doesn't target any specific community, be it Brahmins or anyone else. This collective clarification from the team truly highlights their commitment to responsible storytelling and ensuring their message isn't lost in translation or misconstrued.

Ultimately, what Manoj Bajpayee and his team want us to understand is that the art they create aims to provoke thought and inspire change, especially concerning deep-seated societal issues. His recent clarification serves as a powerful reminder: context is everything, and sometimes, a closer look reveals an entirely different, more profound intention than what first meets the eye. It's a call to look beyond superficial interpretations and grasp the genuine anti-corruption sentiment at play.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on