Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Kenvue's Tylenol Turmoil: RFK Jr.'s Autism Report Sends Stock Reeling Amidst Scientific and Legal Battles

  • Nishadil
  • September 06, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 7 Views
Kenvue's Tylenol Turmoil: RFK Jr.'s Autism Report Sends Stock Reeling Amidst Scientific and Legal Battles

Kenvue, the consumer health powerhouse behind iconic brands like Tylenol, Neutrogena, and Listerine, experienced a tumultuous trading day as its stock plummeted by approximately 6% to 7%. This significant dip, which wiped billions off its market capitalization, was largely triggered by the anticipation of a forthcoming report from Robert F.

Kennedy Jr.'s Children's Health Defense organization, which is expected to reignite controversial claims linking prenatal Tylenol use to autism.

The impending report marks a fresh wave of scrutiny for Kenvue, a company that spun off from Johnson & Johnson in 2023. While Kenvue stands as a titan in the over-the-counter medication and personal care space, the shadow of litigation and public health concerns continues to loom, particularly around its flagship pain reliever, Tylenol (acetaminophen).

RFK Jr.'s organization alleges that not only does a link exist between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders like autism, but that Johnson & Johnson and its McNeil Consumer Healthcare division have actively sought to conceal this alleged connection for decades.

This isn't the first time Tylenol has been at the center of such a storm.

For years, thousands of lawsuits have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, all alleging a causal link between prenatal Tylenol exposure and autism or ADHD. However, in a significant development late last year, the judge overseeing the MDL delivered a major blow to the plaintiffs by excluding their expert scientific testimony, deeming it unreliable.

This ruling effectively derailed thousands of cases, leading to their dismissal and providing a substantial victory for Kenvue and its former parent company, Johnson & Johnson.

Despite this legal triumph, the market's reaction to RFK Jr.'s upcoming report underscores the enduring power of public perception and the influence of prominent figures, regardless of scientific consensus.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a well-known environmental lawyer, anti-vaccine activist, and now a presidential candidate, has a history of challenging established medical and scientific views. His Children's Health Defense organization frequently publishes content critical of pharmaceutical companies and mainstream public health recommendations.

It's crucial to note that the overwhelming scientific and medical consensus, upheld by leading organizations such as the U.S.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), maintains that acetaminophen is generally considered safe for use during pregnancy when taken as directed. While some observational studies have suggested a correlation between prenatal acetaminophen use and neurodevelopmental issues, these studies have consistently failed to establish causation, leaving the scientific community largely in agreement on its safety profile.

The market's knee-jerk reaction to RFK Jr.'s announcement likely stems from a fear of renewed public alarm, potential for new or revived litigation, and the possibility of increased regulatory scrutiny, irrespective of the scientific backing or recent legal outcomes.

For Kenvue, navigating these turbulent waters will require a delicate balance of robust scientific defense, transparent communication, and proactive engagement to reassure both investors and consumers about the safety and efficacy of its products. The coming weeks will undoubtedly be critical as the company prepares to address the claims made in RFK Jr.'s highly anticipated report.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on