Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Italy Fines Apple Over Misleading 'Privacy' Feature, Company Vows Appeal

  • Nishadil
  • December 23, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 13 Views
Italy Fines Apple Over Misleading 'Privacy' Feature, Company Vows Appeal

Apple Hit with €10 Million Fine in Italy for Allegedly Misleading Users on App Tracking Transparency Feature

Italy's antitrust watchdog has fined Apple €10 million for allegedly misleading consumers about its App Tracking Transparency feature. The agency claims Apple didn't clearly state it could still collect user data for its own purposes, despite promoting the feature as a privacy safeguard. Apple has announced it will appeal the decision.

It seems the tech giant Apple is once again facing a legal challenge over how it handles user data. This time, it's Italy's antitrust agency, the AGCM, that has delivered a substantial blow, fining Apple a hefty €10 million (that's roughly US$11.6 million) for what it calls "misleading commercial practices." At the heart of the matter is Apple's much-touted App Tracking Transparency (ATT) feature, a privacy control that the agency argues wasn't quite as transparent as it let on.

You see, the AGCM's primary concern isn't the existence of the ATT feature itself, which, on the surface, appears to give users more control over their data. Rather, the watchdog contends that Apple failed to adequately inform consumers that, even with ATT enabled, the company itself could — and did — continue to collect user data for its own commercial and promotional purposes. Imagine turning on a light switch, believing it cuts all power, only to find the main appliance is still drawing current. It's a subtle but crucial distinction that many users likely missed.

The agency highlighted that Apple promoted ATT as a comprehensive tool to protect user privacy, giving the impression that all data collection and tracking would be limited or outright prevented. Yet, according to the AGCM, Apple didn't make it sufficiently clear that this protection primarily applied to third-party tracking, leaving Apple free to gather and utilize user data internally. This, they argue, constitutes a misleading practice, creating a false sense of security for consumers who believed they were opting out of all tracking.

The fine, while significant, is accompanied by an order for Apple to publish a corrective statement on its Italian website. This move underscores the agency's intent not just to penalize, but also to ensure consumers are properly informed going forward. It's a clear message that even major players like Apple aren't above scrutiny when it comes to the crucial topic of data privacy.

Of course, Apple isn't taking this lying down. The company quickly announced its intention to appeal the decision, reiterating its stance that the App Tracking Transparency feature is designed to empower users and give them control over their data. Apple stated that its own data practices comply with privacy laws, including the stringent GDPR regulations. It's a classic corporate response: deny, defend, and appeal. They're basically saying, "We did nothing wrong, and our feature does what we say it does for users."

This isn't an isolated incident for Apple in Italy, nor is it unique globally. Regulators worldwide are increasingly flexing their muscles against tech giants, scrutinizing how they market and implement privacy features, especially when those features might serve the company's interests as much as the user's. The balance between offering genuine privacy controls and a company's business model, which often relies on data, is a tricky tightrope walk, and sometimes, companies just stumble.

Ultimately, this case serves as a powerful reminder for consumers to dig deeper into the promises made by tech companies regarding their data. While features like App Tracking Transparency are a step in the right direction, the devil, as always, is in the details. True data privacy often requires more than just a single toggle switch; it demands constant vigilance and critical thinking from users, and uncompromising transparency from the companies they trust with their digital lives.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on