Delhi | 25°C (windy)

India-US Trade Deal: A Raw Deal for India, Alleges Congress

  • Nishadil
  • February 22, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 14 Views
India-US Trade Deal: A Raw Deal for India, Alleges Congress

Pawan Khera Slams Proposed Trade Pact, Calls it 'All Pain, No Gain' for the Nation

Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera delivers a scathing critique of the ongoing India-US trade negotiations, asserting that the proposed deal overwhelmingly favors the US and offers little benefit to India, especially its crucial agricultural and manufacturing sectors.

Well, if you thought the proposed India-US trade deal was sailing smoothly, think again. The Congress party, through its articulate spokesperson Pawan Khera, has just thrown a significant wrench into those gears, asserting with palpable frustration that the deal is shaping up to be 'all pain, no gain' for India. It’s quite the strong statement, isn't it? Khera minced no words, effectively painting a picture of India potentially ceding far too much ground in these critical negotiations.

During a rather pointed press conference, Khera didn't just stop at a general critique. He delved deeper, expressing serious concerns about how this trade agreement could negatively impact vital sectors of the Indian economy. We're talking about our farmers, for starters, particularly those in the dairy sector, who are already facing their own set of challenges. The specter of cheaper US agricultural products, particularly dairy, flooding the Indian market seems to be a major worry for the Congress, and frankly, it’s a valid concern many hold.

It’s not just agriculture either. Khera seemed to suggest a broader pattern where India might be ceding too much ground across the board, without adequate reciprocal benefits. He highlighted the potential for our domestic manufacturing and pharmaceutical industries to be disproportionately affected. You see, the fear is that rather than fostering mutual growth, the terms of the deal could instead make our homegrown industries vulnerable to fierce, often unequal, competition from American counterparts.

What's more, the Congress leader squarely questioned the transparency surrounding these ongoing discussions. In an era where public scrutiny is more important than ever, it begs the question: why the perceived lack of clarity? Khera effectively demanded a more open approach, urging the government to be far more forthcoming with details about the specific concessions India is being asked to make and, crucially, what tangible benefits we are truly set to gain in return.

Ultimately, Khera’s impassioned plea boiled down to a fundamental point: India must safeguard its national interests above all else. He called for a meticulous re-evaluation of the deal's fine print, ensuring that any agreement truly serves the Indian populace and not just a select few or, worse yet, the economic agenda of another nation. This isn't just political posturing, you know; it’s a critical call for accountability and a reminder that trade deals, when not carefully constructed, can have profound and lasting impacts on a country's economic fabric.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on