India Stands Firm: Rejects Nepal's Lipulekh Objections, Upholds Border Integrity

India has unequivocally rejected Nepal's recent objections concerning ongoing trade activities through the strategically vital Lipulekh Pass, asserting that Kathmandu's territorial claims over the region are entirely 'untenable'. This firm stance was articulated by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), which reiterated India's consistent position on its established boundaries, particularly in the contentious Kalapani-Limpiyadhura-Lipulekh tri-junction area.

The diplomatic exchange flared up after Nepal's Embassy in New Delhi reportedly raised a protest, taking issue with India's continued use and development of the trade route via Lipulekh. However, India swiftly dismissed these concerns, emphasizing that its activities fall entirely within its sovereign territory. The MEA underscored that any unilateral redefinition of boundaries by Nepal is unacceptable and not based on historical facts or existing agreements.

At the heart of this enduring border dispute lies the interpretation of the 1816 Treaty of Sugauli, which delineates the boundary along the Kali River. India maintains that the Kali River originates at Kalapani, thereby placing Kalapani, Limpiyadhura, and Lipulekh within Indian territory. Conversely, Nepal claims the river's source is further west, placing these areas within its own borders. This divergence in interpretation has been a long-standing point of contention between the two South Asian neighbours.

The issue gained significant momentum in 2020 when Nepal issued a new political map unilaterally incorporating Kalapani, Limpiyadhura, and Lipulekh into its territory, a move that was met with immediate and strong condemnation from India. India consistently stated that such unilateral actions are not based on historical evidence and are contrary to the understanding of the two nations. The Lipulekh Pass itself holds immense strategic and religious significance, serving as a key trade route and a traditional pilgrimage path to Kailash Mansarovar.

Despite the current diplomatic friction, India has consistently expressed its readiness to engage in constructive dialogue to resolve boundary disputes through established mechanisms. However, it maintains that any discussions must be grounded in facts and mutual understanding, respecting the territorial integrity and sovereignty of both nations. The unwavering rejection of Nepal's objections over Lipulekh trade underscores India's commitment to safeguarding its borders and upholding its long-held territorial positions.