Hyderabad's Air Quality Apps: Why Official Sources Say Your Data Might Be All Wrong
Share- Nishadil
- January 31, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 1 Views
Debunking the Digital Haze: Telangana Pollution Board Says Third-Party AQI Apps Mislead Public
The Telangana State Pollution Control Board warns that popular third-party air quality apps are giving "false and misleading" readings for Hyderabad by incorrectly applying US environmental standards to Indian data, causing undue public alarm.
Ever glanced at an air quality app on your phone, seen a concerning number, and felt a sudden knot in your stomach? You're not alone. Many of us rely on these handy digital tools to gauge the air we breathe. But here's a rather crucial heads-up, especially if you're in Hyderabad: the Telangana State Pollution Control Board (TSPCB) is telling us that many of these popular third-party apps might actually be giving us a completely "false and misleading" picture of our city's air.
It's quite the statement, isn't it? The reason, it turns out, isn't that the raw data itself is necessarily fabricated, but rather how it's being interpreted. Dr. N. Raveendhar, a Senior Environmental Scientist with TSPCB, laid it out quite clearly: these apps, more often than not, are taking Indian air quality data and running it through a sieve of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards. Now, while the US EPA certainly sets rigorous benchmarks, they're not the same as India's own Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) standards. And that, my friends, makes all the difference.
Think of it like this: imagine trying to measure a cricket pitch using American football yard lines. You'll get a measurement, sure, but it won't accurately reflect the game being played. The same principle applies here. The threshold for what's considered "good" air quality, or "moderate," or even "poor," differs significantly between the two systems. For a stark example, let's look at PM2.5, those tiny particulate matters that are a major concern for respiratory health. The US EPA classifies 0-12 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³) as "good" air. India's CPCB, however, sets the "good" bar much higher, from 0-30 µg/m³. See the disparity? What might be perfectly "satisfactory" by Indian standards could easily get flagged as "moderate" or even "poor" on an app using stricter US benchmarks, even if the actual pollutant levels are identical.
This mismatch, according to the TSPCB, isn't just a technicality; it's causing "unnecessary panic" among residents. Nobody wants to breathe bad air, and the constant alerts from apps can understandably create a pervasive sense of alarm. But if those alarms are based on a flawed interpretation, then we're worrying needlessly, or at least, worrying about the wrong metrics.
So, where should we look for reliable information? The TSPCB is quite firm on this: citizens should trust the official data. They monitor air quality diligently across 20 different locations in Hyderabad, employing a robust network of 10 Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations (CAAQMS) and another 10 manual stations. Their data, they assure us, adheres strictly to CPCB norms, providing an accurate, localized picture of the air we're actually breathing according to national guidelines.
In essence, the message is clear: when it comes to understanding Hyderabad's air quality, stick to the sources that are using the correct rulebook. The TSPCB plans to launch a public awareness campaign to help clear up this confusion, encouraging everyone to rely on official CPCB or TSPCB data. After all, accurate information is the first step towards informed decisions, and hopefully, less unwarranted anxiety about the air around us. Let's make sure our apps aren't just blowing smoke, shall we?
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on