Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Gurpurab's Unseen Walls: The Quiet Despair of Denied Pilgrims

  • Nishadil
  • November 06, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 3 Views
Gurpurab's Unseen Walls: The Quiet Despair of Denied Pilgrims

There’s a quiet ache, you see, that settles deep in the heart when a sacred journey—one meticulously planned, anticipated with fervent prayers—is abruptly, inexplicably cut short. For thousands of Indian Sikh pilgrims, that ache became a harsh reality just days before Gurpurab, the immensely holy birth anniversary of Guru Nanak Dev Ji. It wasn't merely a travel plan disrupted; no, this was a spiritual pilgrimage, a yearning to visit revered gurdwaras across the border in Pakistan, tragically thwarted by what many now call a ‘coordinated denial’ of visas.

Imagine, if you will, the sheer disbelief. Nearly 98% of some 3,000 applicants saw their dreams vanish into thin air. A staggering number, really, leaving only a tiny handful — perhaps 60 souls — with the permission to embark on their spiritual quest. And it wasn't just ordinary devotees; even prominent community leaders found themselves caught in this bewildering bureaucratic tangle. Harmeet Singh Kalka, the current President of the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC), and his predecessor, Manjinder Singh Sirsa, both faced this unexpected refusal. One might naturally wonder: what could possibly be the reasoning behind such a sweeping rejection, especially for individuals who represent a significant voice within the Sikh community?

The timing, honestly, feels particularly cruel. Just when the air should be thick with anticipation, with the hymns of devotion, Pakistan’s High Commission in Delhi delivered its crushing news. Pilgrims, in truth, had followed all the proper channels, clutching valid invitations from Pakistan's Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB) – the very entity responsible for maintaining Sikh shrines there. Yet, the official line remained stubbornly vague: "technical reasons." Technical reasons? You could say it rings hollow, almost an insult to the fervent faith of those hoping to connect with their heritage.

And for once, this wasn't an isolated incident. This isn’t the first time, not by a long shot, that such visa games have played out on the eve of significant Sikh festivals. We've seen similar patterns emerge during Baisakhi and, indeed, on the anniversary of Maharaja Ranjit Singh's passing. It builds a concerning narrative, doesn't it? A pattern that suggests something far more deliberate than mere administrative glitches; something, perhaps, aimed at restricting cross-border religious ties, or at least, making them excruciatingly difficult.

The impact, as you might guess, goes far beyond logistics. This denial strikes at the very heart of religious freedom, denying individuals the fundamental right to practice their faith in places sacred to them. India, for its part, has consistently voiced deep concerns over the years about the treatment of minorities and, yes, the safety of pilgrims within Pakistan’s borders. There's a bilateral protocol, signed way back in 1974, that supposedly governs these visits to religious shrines. Yet, these repeated denials seem to, well, chip away at the spirit, if not the letter, of that agreement.

Of course, there’s the Kartarpur Corridor, a beacon of hope for many, offering visa-free access to Darbar Sahib. And it is, indeed, a wonderful initiative. But one mechanism does not, cannot, fully alleviate the broader, persistent issue of general pilgrimages to other vital gurdwaras scattered across Pakistan. For the thousands left behind, their suitcases unpacked, their prayers unspoken on holy ground, Gurpurab this year will be tinged with a profound sadness, a reminder of borders that sometimes seem to close not just land, but also spirit.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on