Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Golden Temple Standoff: Police Detention Ignites Outrage, SGPC Demands Answers

  • Nishadil
  • February 01, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 0 Views
Golden Temple Standoff: Police Detention Ignites Outrage, SGPC Demands Answers

Controversy Erupts as Punjab Police Detain Two Men at Golden Temple, SGPC Condemns Action

An unexpected police detention within the sacred precincts of the Golden Temple has sparked a major dispute between Punjab Police and the SGPC, raising questions of jurisdiction and religious sanctity.

A scene unfolded this past Monday morning at the revered Golden Temple in Amritsar that, frankly, left many aghast and deeply concerned. Imagine, if you will, the serene environment of the Gurdwara Sahib, bustling quietly with devotees, when suddenly, Punjab Police personnel stepped in and, quite boldly, detained two individuals right from the sacred parikrama, the circumambulation path. It wasn't just a simple arrest; it ignited a firestorm of protest, particularly from the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), the very body tasked with managing Sikh shrines.

The police, you see, initially justified their rather unprecedented action by citing "suspicious activity." They claimed these two men were behaving oddly, perhaps planning something untoward within the hallowed complex. One of the detained individuals was later identified as Jarnail Singh from Bathinda, while details about the other remained a bit hazy at first. They were swiftly taken to the Division A police station, leaving a palpable tension lingering in the air.

But here's where the plot thickens: the SGPC was having none of it. Their top brass, including general secretary Gurcharan Singh Grewal, immediately and unequivocally slammed the police move. They called it a blatant and utterly unacceptable intrusion into the sanctity of Sri Harmandar Sahib – the Golden Temple – and a direct challenge to the Sikh community's cherished principles. "This is an attack on our dignity," one official reportedly exclaimed, highlighting the deep emotional impact such an incident carries for Sikhs worldwide.

What followed was swift and decisive action from the SGPC's side. Not only did they launch their own internal investigation, meticulously reviewing CCTV footage from the temple premises, but they also dispatched their dedicated task force straight to the police station. Their aim? To understand exactly what transpired, to ensure the rights of the detained were upheld, and to fiercely protect the autonomous domain of the Gurdwara complex. It truly felt like a battle for sovereignty, if you ask me, even over something as seemingly minor as a police detention.

Eventually, after a period of intense questioning and mounting pressure, the police released both men. The official word? Nothing incriminating was found. Nothing at all. This, of course, only fueled the SGPC's earlier condemnation, reinforcing their stance that the police action was entirely unwarranted and perhaps even an overreach. It begged the question: what exactly constituted "suspicious activity" in the first place if no evidence surfaced?

Indeed, the head of Amritsar Rural Police, SSP Swarandeep Singh, later somewhat backtracked, softening the initial strong claims about an impending 'incident' to simply "suspicious men." This shift in narrative, understandably, did little to quell the outrage. One of the released men, interestingly, was later taken for a medical check-up, though the specific reasons for this remain a bit unclear, adding another layer of intrigue to an already perplexing situation.

Ultimately, this incident has undeniably ruffled feathers, stirring up significant debate about police jurisdiction within religious complexes and the delicate balance between security concerns and the deeply held sentiments of a community. The SGPC remains steadfast in its resolve, signaling that this matter is far from over, and that accountability for such actions will certainly be sought.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on