Founder Abhijeet Dipke Fires Back at ‘Cockroach’ Claims, Shows Who’s Really Following CJPS

When a rumor spreads like wildfire, the first instinct is often to dismiss it as nonsense. Yet the chatter about CJPS being a “cockroach” operation allegedly originating from Pakistan has been anything but quiet. The buzz, which began on a handful of social‑media threads, quickly snowballed into a full‑blown controversy that even made its way onto mainstream news portals.

Enter Abhijeet Dipke, the founder of CJPS, who decided not to stay silent. Instead of issuing a brief, generic denial, he chose a more data‑driven route: he posted a snapshot of his followers’ demographics. The idea was simple—show the world who actually follows CJPS and, by extension, who the organization serves.

According to the charts he shared, the bulk of CJPS’s audience hails from Indian states such as Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and West Bengal. The age bracket is largely 18‑35, a demographic that, as any marketer will tell you, is heavily active on platforms like Instagram and Twitter. In short, the numbers paint a picture of a home‑grown, youth‑centric community rather than a foreign‑manned infiltration.

“Look, the data speaks for itself,” Dipke wrote in the caption accompanying the graphic. “If we were a Pakistani outfit, you’d see a completely different geographic spread. The reality is far more nuanced.” He added a quick disclaimer that the data reflects only publicly available insights, not any private analytics—just to keep things transparent, he says.

Critics, however, were quick to point out that demographics alone don’t prove intent. Some commentators suggested that a group could still be influenced by external actors while enjoying a largely domestic follower base. Dipke responded with a touch of patience, noting that motives are harder to gauge than numbers, but that “the overwhelming domestic interest makes the foreign‑link narrative rather thin.”

Beyond the numbers, there’s a human side to this saga. Many CJPS supporters have expressed frustration at being painted with a broad brush, feeling that the “cockroach” label is both demeaning and unhelpful. One follower, writing in a private group chat, said, “We’re just trying to discuss issues that matter to us. Getting called a pest because of where we live feels wrong.”

The whole episode underscores a broader trend: in the age of instant virality, accusations can travel faster than facts. Dipke’s move to lay out follower demographics is a reminder that sometimes, a simple visual can cut through the noise, even if it doesn’t settle every argument.

Whether the controversy will die down remains to be seen. What is clear, though, is that Abhijeet Dipke isn’t planning to let the rumor mill run unchecked. For now, he’s letting the data do the talking, hoping that transparency will at least temper the more sensational claims.