Five Years On: The Unfolding Betrayal in Quebec's Healthcare System for Indigenous Communities
Share- Nishadil
- September 28, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 1 Views

Five years have passed since the horrifying death of Joyce Echaquan, an Atikamekw woman whose final moments, livestreamed from a Joliette hospital bed, exposed the raw, agonizing truth of systemic racism within Quebec's healthcare system. Her cries for help, met with racist insults from medical staff, became a chilling testament to the profound discrimination Indigenous individuals endure.
Today, a half-decade later, advocates and Indigenous leaders stand united, warning that despite widespread outrage and official apologies, the very same insidious issues continue to plague the system, leaving a legacy of fear, distrust, and inadequate care.
The echoes of Joyce's tragedy resonate deeply, underscoring a stark reality: for many Indigenous people, seeking medical attention in Quebec remains a daunting, often terrifying, prospect.
"The sentiment is that our people are still afraid to go to hospitals," stated Ghislain Picard, Chief of the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador, capturing the collective apprehension. This pervasive fear is not unfounded; it stems from generations of systemic discrimination and the lived experience of encountering prejudiced attitudes and insufficient culturally safe services.
Despite the Viens Commission's damning report in 2019, which affirmed the existence of systemic racism against Indigenous peoples in public services, and the coroner's recommendations following Echaquan's death, concrete, transformative change remains painfully slow.
Indigenous communities have tirelessly advocated for the adoption of "Joyce's Principle" — a powerful framework designed to guarantee that all Indigenous people have equitable access to the highest standard of health and social services, free from discrimination. Yet, Quebec's government has, thus far, resisted fully enshrining this vital principle into law, opting instead for partial measures that fall short of the comprehensive, legally binding commitment demanded by First Nations.
This reluctance to embrace Joyce's Principle as law is seen by many as a significant barrier to true reconciliation and a continued failure to address the root causes of inequity.
It signifies a missed opportunity to dismantle the very structures that allowed Joyce Echaquan's horrific experience to unfold. Leaders like Constant Awashish, Grand Chief of the Atikamekw Nation, continue to emphasize that without full legal recognition and implementation, the apologies ring hollow, and the promise of a safer, more equitable system remains unfulfilled.
The current state of affairs is not merely a bureaucratic oversight; it is a profound human rights issue that directly impacts the health and well-being of entire communities.
It highlights a critical need for genuine self-determination in healthcare, allowing Indigenous communities to develop and deliver services that are truly responsive to their cultural needs and historical contexts. Training programs for healthcare professionals, increased Indigenous representation in the health sector, and culturally sensitive infrastructure are all crucial components of the path forward.
As the five-year mark passes, the call for action grows louder and more urgent.
It is a demand for accountability, not just from individual practitioners, but from the institutions and policies that perpetuate discrimination. The memory of Joyce Echaquan serves not only as a reminder of a tragic loss but as a powerful, enduring beacon for justice, urging Quebec to move beyond rhetoric and towards a healthcare system where every individual, regardless of their background, is treated with dignity, respect, and equitable care.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on