Female RCMP Officer Contradicts Colleague's Apology Claim in Tense Disciplinary Hearing

A high-stakes disciplinary hearing for an RCMP sergeant has taken a dramatic turn, as a female corporal directly contradicted her colleague's testimony regarding an alleged apology for derogatory messages shared in a private chat group. Corporal Elizabeth Cindric testified that Sergeant Aaron Barker never apologized to her for the offensive remarks, nor did he acknowledge the derogatory nature of the messages.

This testimony directly challenges Sgt.

Barker's earlier statement that he had personally apologized to Cpl. Cindric after she raised concerns about the inappropriate comments. Cpl. Cindric, who served under Sgt. Barker in the North Vancouver RCMP detachment, stated unequivocally that no such apology occurred, and instead, Barker merely indicated that he knew who had sent the messages and that the sender had been removed from the chat.

The messages at the heart of the controversy included a comment referring to women as "bitches" and "c*nts" and another remark about "hot girls in yoga pants" in reference to a public photo.

These messages were part of a private WhatsApp group that included Sgt. Barker and other officers.

Sgt. Barker faces serious allegations, including failing to treat colleagues with respect, engaging in discreditable conduct, and making a false or misleading statement during an internal investigation.

The force alleges that Barker failed to take appropriate action to stop the sharing of derogatory messages in the chat group and, in fact, participated in it by sending a laughing emoji in response to some of the offensive content.

Cpl. Cindric detailed her discomfort and the profound impact the messages had on her, describing them as "demeaning and misogynistic." She expressed her disappointment in the workplace culture that allowed such comments to circulate among senior officers.

Her decision to speak up about the messages was driven by a desire for accountability and to ensure a respectful environment for all members.

During cross-examination, Sgt. Barker's legal counsel probed Cpl. Cindric's memory and motivations, suggesting that she might be mistaken about the apology or that her recollections were influenced by the ongoing disciplinary process.

However, Cpl. Cindric remained firm in her account, emphasizing the clarity of her memory regarding the absence of an apology concerning the specific content of the messages.

The hearing continues to delve into the conduct of Sgt. Barker and the broader issues of professionalism and respect within the RCMP.

The outcome of this case could have significant implications for workplace standards and accountability within the national police force.