Federal Minister Slams Marineland's 'Inappropriate' Bid for Beluga Whale Funding
Share- Nishadil
- October 07, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 4 Views

A heated controversy has erupted after Canada's Fisheries Minister, Diane Lebouthillier, unequivocally rejected Marineland's request for federal funds to care for its beluga whales. Minister Lebouthillier minced no words, labeling the plea from the Niagara Falls aquatic park as 'inappropriate,' asserting that public coffers are not meant to prop up private, for-profit enterprises.
Speaking from Ottawa, the Minister clarified her department's stance with firm resolve.
"It is clear that Marineland is a for-profit enterprise. It is not the role of the federal government to subsidize the operations of a for-profit entity," Lebouthillier stated, emphasizing that while the government's priority remains animal welfare, direct financial support for Marineland's operational costs is not on the table.
She highlighted that all licensed animal parks must adhere to rigorous regulations under the federal animal welfare act, which includes ensuring adequate care for their animals.
This pointed refusal comes amidst ongoing scrutiny of Marineland's animal care practices and its significant population of beluga whales.
The park has faced criticism and legal challenges regarding the welfare of its animals for years. Despite these concerns, Marineland continues to house 42 belugas, a number that raises questions about the long-term financial and ethical responsibilities involved in their care.
The New Democrats swiftly weighed in, with MP Leah Gazan condemning what she sees as a lack of concrete action from the government.
Gazan argued that simply rejecting Marineland's request isn't enough, calling for more proactive measures to ensure the belugas' well-being. She reiterated her party's long-standing call for the government to facilitate the relocation of these intelligent marine mammals to accredited sanctuaries, where they could potentially live in more natural and less restrictive environments.
The debate intensified following the recent transfer of two belugas from Marineland to Mystic Aquarium in Connecticut, USA, an move that also drew mixed reactions.
While it reduced Marineland's beluga population slightly, it did not resolve the overarching issues surrounding the remaining animals.
Minister Lebouthillier's unequivocal 'no' signals a clear boundary between government responsibility for animal welfare oversight and the financial obligations of private businesses.
As the fate of Marineland's 42 belugas hangs in the balance, this decision underscores the ongoing tensions between conservation, animal rights advocacy, and the economic realities of operating large-scale marine parks.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on