Federal Judge Intervenes: Voice of America Job Cuts Halted Amid Fierce Union Legal Battle
Share- Nishadil
- September 30, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 3 Views

In a significant victory for labor rights and a temporary reprieve for international broadcasters, a federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order, effectively halting impending job cuts at Voice of America (VOA). The ruling comes after the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1812, representing VOA staff, filed a lawsuit, arguing that the U.S.
Agency for Global Media (USAGM) failed to negotiate the cuts in violation of their union contracts.
U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Kelly's order, issued Friday, prevents the agency from moving forward with plans to eliminate up to 15 journalist and foreign language service positions, which were scheduled to take effect on May 26.
This judicial intervention underscores the ongoing tensions between USAGM leadership and the employees of its global broadcasting networks, particularly concerning VOA's operational independence and mission.
The USAGM, which oversees VOA and other U.S.-funded news outlets, had cited a congressional directive to merge VOA with the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) and optimize resources as the justification for the layoffs.
However, the union vehemently contended that the agency provided no specific reasons for the individual job eliminations, nor did it engage in the mandatory negotiations required by their collective bargaining agreement. This perceived lack of transparency and consultation formed the bedrock of the union's legal challenge.
According to the union, these proposed cuts are not only arbitrary but also pose a significant threat to VOA's core mission of delivering accurate and objective news to global audiences, especially in regions where free press is suppressed.
They argue that diminishing the workforce, particularly within foreign language services, could undermine U.S. national security interests by weakening VOA's ability to counter misinformation and provide reliable information worldwide.
The dispute is the latest in a series of challenges faced by USAGM, an agency that has been embroiled in controversy since the Trump administration, with persistent concerns raised about political interference and threats to the independence of its news organizations.
While the current USAGM head, Amanda Bennett, was appointed by President Biden with a mandate to restore credibility, the agency continues to navigate complex internal and external pressures.
This isn't the first time proposed job cuts at VOA have sparked fierce opposition. Kelu Chao, who served as interim CEO before Bennett's appointment, also faced strong union resistance over similar plans.
The consistent pushback highlights a deep-seated concern among VOA employees and their representatives about the long-term strategic direction and operational integrity of the institution.
Judge Kelly's injunction will remain in effect until June 10, or until further order from the court. The union has expressed hope that this legal pause will compel USAGM to engage in meaningful negotiations, potentially leading to the reversal of the proposed job cuts.
For now, the ruling provides a crucial moment of stability for the affected personnel and emphasizes the critical role of collective bargaining in protecting public service media employees.
.- UnitedStatesOfAmerica
- News
- Top
- TopNews
- Lawsuit
- Union
- TrumpAdministration
- JobCuts
- FederalJudge
- LaborDispute
- MediaIndependence
- Mcnd
- FederalJudgeRuling
- UsInfluence
- VoiceOfAmerica
- Voa
- UsAgencyForGlobalMedia
- Usagm
- KariLake
- RoyceLamberth
- TemporaryRestrainingOrder
- InternationalBroadcasting
- RadioFreeAsia
- RadioMarti
- StatutoryMission
- RadioFreeEurope
- ColdWarMedia
- MiddleEastBroadcastingNetworks
- GovernmentFundedMedia
- ReductionInForce
- VoaProgramming
- AfgeLocal1812
- TimothyKelly
- AmandaBennett
- OfficeOfCubaBroadcasting
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on