Ex-NJ State Museum Worker Indicted for Alleged $31K Unemployment Fraud

A former employee of the New Jersey State Museum is now at the center of a significant legal battle, accused of defrauding the state's unemployment system of more than $31,000. Elizabeth Delapaz, 38, of Trenton, faces a multi-count indictment for allegedly collecting benefits while actively employed, a scheme spanning over three years.

According to officials from the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General, Delapaz is alleged to have unlawfully received a staggering $31,586 in unemployment benefits between March 2020 and October 2023.

The core of the accusation is that she failed to disclose her employment at the New Jersey State Museum while simultaneously applying for and receiving unemployment payments, a clear violation of state regulations designed to ensure fair allocation of aid.

The severity of the allegations is reflected in the charges brought against her by a state grand jury.

Delapaz has been indicted on one count of second-degree theft by deception, one count of third-degree unsworn falsification, and two counts of fourth-degree unsworn falsification. These charges underscore the state’s commitment to prosecuting those who misuse public funds.

Second-degree crimes in New Jersey carry a substantial penalty, including a potential prison sentence of five to ten years and fines up to $150,000.

A third-degree offense can result in three to five years in prison and a fine up to $15,000, while a fourth-degree offense may lead to up to 18 months in prison and a fine up to $10,000. These penalties highlight the serious nature of the alleged offenses and the state's stance against fraud.

The indictment is the result of a thorough investigation by the New Jersey Department of Labor’s Enforcement and Wage and Hour Division, the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General, and the New Jersey State Police.

This collaborative effort demonstrates the state's robust approach to uncovering and prosecuting unemployment fraud, especially in cases involving substantial sums and public trust.

While the charges are severe, it is crucial to remember that Elizabeth Delapaz is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Her case will proceed through the legal system, where she will have the opportunity to defend herself against these serious allegations. This case serves as a stark reminder of the rigorous oversight applied to state benefit programs and the potential consequences for those accused of exploitation.