Echoes from Ukhrul: Muivah's Unwavering Clarion Call for Naga Sovereignty

There was a palpable sense of anticipation, wasn't there, in Lungwaphung, Ukhrul? A vast gathering had converged, their eyes fixed on one figure, Th. Muivah, the general secretary of the National Socialist Council of Nagalim (Isak-Muivah). And for good reason, you could say. It was a moment laden with history, certainly with profound meaning for the Naga people, as he stood before them, delivering a message that — in truth — echoed what many already felt deep in their hearts: their flag, their very own constitution, these are simply non-negotiable.

You see, this wasn't just another political speech. Far from it. This was Muivah, speaking candidly and with unwavering conviction, reiterating a foundational truth for the Naga political issue's ultimate, lasting resolution. He was there at a "Naga People's Consultative Meeting," a significant event held on the seventh anniversary of that pivotal Framework Agreement from August 3, 2015. A date, honestly, that many still hold onto with a fragile mix of hope and, perhaps, a little frustration.

And what did he emphasize? Well, fundamentally, the unique history and distinct identity of the Naga people. It's a narrative that isn't just a claim, mind you; it's a lived experience, deeply ingrained. He pointed out, rather sharply, that the Government of India itself had acknowledged this 'unique' identity within the very Framework Agreement. A recognition, some would argue, that should naturally pave the way for self-determination. Yet, here we are, still debating these fundamental symbols of nationhood.

But there’s a hitch, isn't there? A very significant one. Muivah didn't mince words when he spoke of the 'competent authority' – a diplomatic way, perhaps, to refer to those on the other side of the negotiating table. He expressed clear disappointment, even dismay, over their supposed rejection of these core demands. It feels, for some, like a betrayal of the spirit of dialogue, a dragging of heels when a resolution, many believe, is tantalizingly close, yet perpetually out of reach.

"We will never, ever surrender our rights," he declared, a sentiment that resonated powerfully through the crowd. This isn't just about political leverage; it’s about a people’s soul, their aspiration. And, crucially, he cautioned against those age-old tactics, the 'divide and rule' strategies, which, let's be honest, have a way of surfacing in complex regional conflicts. Unity, he insisted, remained paramount. Other Naga luminaries, including the esteemed Lt. Gen. (Retd) V.S. Atem, echoed this plea for solidarity, knowing full well that a fractured voice often struggles to be heard.

For decades now, the "Naga solution" has been a topic of exhaustive, often painstaking, discussions. But these very issues — a separate flag, a distinct constitution — have consistently acted as the primary stumbling blocks, casting long shadows over the path to peace. It makes one wonder, truly, what it will take for a mutually respectful understanding to finally emerge. What a moment it will be when the pen finally meets paper on a truly inclusive accord.