DNC's $20 Million Secret: Handshake Deal Allegedly Cleared Harris's Campaign Debt

An explosive new report has shed light on a significant, previously undisclosed agreement involving the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Vice President Kamala Harris's past presidential campaign. It alleges that the DNC quietly took on over $20 million in debt from Harris's failed 2020 presidential bid, a move reportedly part of a crucial 'handshake deal' orchestrated to secure her place on Joe Biden's ticket.

This startling revelation, detailed in a forthcoming book, paints a vivid picture of the intense political maneuvering behind the scenes during the critical 2020 election cycle.

According to sources cited in the report, then-candidate Joe Biden's campaign made a direct pledge to Harris: endorse Biden, and her substantial campaign debt would be absorbed. This agreement paved the way for her selection as Biden's running mate, ultimately elevating her to the Vice Presidency.

The mechanism for this debt clearance involved the DNC leveraging funds from the Biden Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee designed to support both the presidential campaign and the national party.

While such funds are typically used for broader party-building efforts or general election activities, their alleged diversion to settle a specific candidate's primary campaign debt raises significant eyebrows and prompts questions about the ethical boundaries of campaign finance.

The report suggests that payments to clear Harris's debt began flowing shortly after she officially joined the Biden-Harris ticket.

This swift action to erase a multi-million-dollar financial burden for a specific individual's past primary campaign is an unusual and substantial undertaking for a national party committee. Critics argue it highlights how party resources can be strategically deployed to consolidate power and reward political loyalty, potentially circumventing the spirit of campaign finance regulations.

Typically, candidates are responsible for their own campaign debts, and national party committees generally focus on supporting current races or the party's overall infrastructure.

The alleged DNC intervention to settle such a large personal campaign debt for a single individual's primary run, particularly in exchange for political endorsement and a VP slot, stands out as a stark departure from conventional practice, potentially blurring the lines between campaign support and political inducement.

This new information is likely to ignite fresh debate over campaign finance transparency, the influence of party leadership in candidate selection, and the intricate web of agreements that often underpin high-stakes political decisions.

As details continue to emerge from the upcoming publication, the full implications of this multi-million-dollar 'handshake deal' are set to become a focal point of discussion.