Washington | 26°C (clear sky)
Did the Cockroach Janta Party’s ‘Chalo Sansad 2.0’ Threat Push Dharmendra Pradhan to Quit?

Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation: how a revived ‘Chalo Sansad’ protest and a flurry of online agitators may have sealed his fate

Amid swelling NEET‑paper‑leak protests, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan quit after two earlier offers to step down were turned down. New intel suggests a threatened ‘Chalo Sansad 2.0’ march and a surge of Pakistani‑run social‑media accounts tipped the balance.

When the NEET paper‑leak controversy erupted, it wasn’t just angry students on the streets; the whole country seemed to be holding its breath. Dharmendra Pradhan, who was steering the education portfolio, found himself in the eye of that storm.

He had already put his resignation on the table – not once, but twice – as protests grew louder and the campus‑walkouts turned violent. The government, however, brushed those offers aside, arguing that the nation needed continuity for the ambitious education reforms that were already in motion. "A minister walking away is the easy way out," senior officials were quoted saying, insisting that problems be fixed, not abandoned.

Then, in late July, a new twist appeared. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), a fringe group that had previously organised the chaotic July 20 “Chalo Sansad” march, hinted at a sequel – a “Chalo Sansad 2.0”. Sources say the mere threat of another massive rally, especially after the police‑action injuries on July 20, unnerved the cabinet.

Adding fuel to the fire, a digital‑monitoring sweep uncovered more than 400 suspicious online accounts spreading the agitation, about a quarter of them allegedly operated from Pakistan. These accounts, some of which had been active during the earlier Operation Sindoor, were pushing anti‑India narratives and stoking misinformation around the protests.

On the ground, Delhi Police’s facial‑recognition system flagged roughly 400 individuals with prior criminal records near the Jantar Mantar protest site between July 20 and July 24. A handful of those were linked to the vandalism that marred the original march.

Faced with this cocktail of public disorder, external meddling and political pressure, the cabinet finally relented. Pradhan submitted his resignation, which President Droupadi Murmu promptly accepted. Within hours, Pralhad Joshi, already a cabinet heavyweight, was handed the additional charge of the education ministry.

The ripple effects didn’t stop there. In Punjab, the resignation sparked a fresh round of demands. The BJP, Congress and Shiromani Akali Dal have all called for the ouster of state Education Minister Harjot Singh Bains and Health Minister Balbir Singh, accusing them of allowing paper leaks. The AAP, meanwhile, has defended its record, saying investigations have been launched wherever wrongdoing was proven.

Political analyst Amarinder Singh Raja Warring welcomed Pradhan’s exit as a triumph for student activism, while urging Punjab’s Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann to follow suit. With the Punjab assembly elections looming, opposition parties are keen to draw a parallel between the Centre’s handling of the NEET saga and the AAP’s own exam‑related controversies.

So, did the spectre of a “Chalo Sansad 2.0” march truly tip the scales? While no single factor can claim sole responsibility, the convergence of a revived protest threat, foreign‑run social‑media blitzes and mounting political heat certainly nudged the decision towards resignation.

Comments 0
Please login to post a comment. Login
No approved comments yet.

Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.