Dharmasthala Mass Burial Case: Complainant's Shocking U-Turn Reshapes SIT Probe

The ongoing Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the sensational Dharmasthala mass burial case has been rocked by a dramatic turn of events. Sujata Bhat, the principal complainant whose allegations sparked the high-level investigation, has officially recanted her initial claims, stating that her earlier statements about the burial of over 300 bodies were based entirely on hearsay and media reports, not personal knowledge.

This significant U-turn emerged during her recent appearance before the SIT, where her fresh statement was officially recorded.

Instead of reiterating her initial accusations, Bhat chose to reveal the names of individuals she claims provided her with the information that fueled her complaint. Among those she named are prominent figures, including former MLAs, journalists, and various activists.

The original complaint, filed by Bhat in November 2023, sent shockwaves through the region.

She had alleged the illegal burial of over 300 unclaimed bodies on private land near the Netravati River in Dharmasthala. These serious accusations prompted the Karnataka High Court to intervene, ordering the formation of a Special Investigation Team to thoroughly probe the matter. The court had also directed the SIT to complete its investigation and submit a report within three months.

The SIT, comprising top police officers and led by Inspector General of Police (Western Range) Chandragupta, has been diligently working on the case.

Their mandate includes examining land records, interviewing witnesses, and collecting forensic evidence to ascertain the truth behind the mass burial claims. Bhat's latest testimony marks a pivotal moment in this complex investigation.

During her revised statement, Sujata Bhat reportedly told the SIT that she had learned about the alleged mass burials through various media reports and conversations with the individuals she has now named.

She maintained that she lacked direct, personal knowledge or evidence to substantiate the initial figure of 300-plus bodies. This new revelation is expected to significantly shift the direction of the SIT's inquiry, as they will now likely focus on verifying the information provided by the individuals Bhat has identified.

The Dharmasthala case has drawn considerable public attention, given the gravity of the allegations and the involvement of a revered religious site.

The High Court's directive underscored the need for a transparent and conclusive investigation. As the SIT continues its work, the focus will now turn to corroborating Bhat's revised statements and exploring the roles of the newly named individuals in disseminating the information about the alleged mass burials.

The quest for truth in this intricate case has just taken an unexpected and intriguing detour.