Devanahalli's Green Heart Under Threat: KIADB Revives Land Grab Bid Amidst 'Agro Zone' Declaration
Share- Nishadil
- January 26, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 5 Views
A Month After 'Agro Zone' Tag, Devanahalli Farmers Brace for Another KIADB Land Acquisition Push
In a baffling turn of events, the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) has re-initiated efforts to acquire over 300 acres of prime agricultural land in Devanahalli, Bengaluru Rural, just weeks after the state government designated parts of the region as an 'agro zone.' This move has reignited protests from local farmers, who view it as a direct threat to their livelihoods and a blatant contradiction of official policy.
Devanahalli, a name often associated with Bengaluru's bustling international airport and its promise of industrial growth, finds itself once again at the heart of a significant land dispute. It’s a perplexing situation, really, where the very land meant for nurturing crops is now being eyed for industrial development, creating a palpable tension between progress and preservation.
Picture this: barely a month has passed since the Karnataka government, in what seemed like a thoughtful move, officially declared several areas within Devanahalli taluk as 'agro zones.' The intent was clear – to safeguard agricultural land, preserving its vital role and prohibiting any non-agricultural activities. You'd think that would be the end of it, a clear demarcation. However, here's the kicker: the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) has just issued a fresh preliminary notification, expressing its intent to acquire a whopping 337.15 acres across six different villages for industrial purposes.
This isn't just any parcel of land; we're talking about Hongenahalli, Muddenahalli, Karahalli, Hosahalli, Kadenahalli, and Maranayakanahalli. These are communities deeply rooted in agriculture, their livelihoods intrinsically linked to the soil beneath their feet. For them, this isn't just a bureaucratic announcement; it's a direct threat to their way of life, a reawakening of old anxieties.
It feels a lot like déjà vu for these villagers, you see. Back in 2021, KIADB had attempted a much larger acquisition, targeting over a thousand acres in the same region. That particular bid was met with fierce, sustained resistance from the local farming community, eventually leading to its withdrawal. The farmers celebrated that victory, believing they had secured their future. But now, it appears the battle isn't quite over.
The contradiction is stark and, frankly, quite baffling. On one hand, the state declares these lands as crucial for agriculture, protecting them from non-farming ventures. On the other, one of its own industrial development arms pushes for acquisition. It raises serious questions about policy coherence and, more importantly, about the state's commitment to its farmers.
Naturally, the farmers are not taking this lying down. They are resolute, recalling their previous success and determined to fight for their land once more. Their message is simple: they want to farm, to continue their traditional way of life, and they refuse to give up their fertile lands for factories. They now have a 30-day window, as per Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act, to formally file their objections. Rest assured, they're preparing to make their voices heard, loud and clear.
This evolving situation in Devanahalli is more than just a local land dispute; it’s a microcosm of a larger conflict playing out across the nation – the perennial tug-of-war between agricultural preservation and the relentless march of industrial expansion. The coming weeks will undoubtedly reveal whether the state prioritizes its 'agro zone' declaration or its industrial ambitions, and at what cost to its farming communities.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on