Democracy Under Scrutiny: Sharad Pawar Warns Against Eroding Trust in Election Commission Amid BJP's Vehement Defense

In a powerful indictment of the current political climate, veteran Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Sharad Pawar has cast a critical eye on the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) fervent defense of the Election Commission (EC). Pawar asserts that the ruling party's vehement reaction to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's observations on the EC is inadvertently — and alarmingly — fueling public mistrust in the very institution designed to uphold the sanctity of India's democratic process.

Addressing the press, Pawar articulated his deep concern, stating that by rushing to the EC's defense, the BJP creates an impression that the Commission is not an independent body.

"It is not proper for any political party to defend the Election Commission," Pawar declared, implying that such actions undermine the crucial perception of the EC's autonomy. Rahul Gandhi had previously questioned the EC's neutrality, particularly regarding the functioning of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and the delayed announcement of Lok Sabha election dates.

These comments, while critical, are part of a democratic discourse; however, the BJP's response, according to Pawar, has only intensified doubts rather than alleviating them.

Pawar underscored the indispensable role of an independent Election Commission in the health of any democracy. He reminisced about the era of former Chief Election Commissioner T.N.

Seshan, a figure widely celebrated for his unwavering resolve and integrity in ensuring fair elections. "Nobody ever dared to question the Election Commission during Seshan's tenure," Pawar noted, drawing a stark contrast with the present situation where even former CECs are voicing concerns about the institution's functioning.

This historical perspective highlights a perceived erosion of the EC's formidable image.

The NCP supremo further pointed to recent observations by the Supreme Court, which has also raised questions about the process of appointing election commissioners. The judiciary's engagement with the matter, alongside political criticism, paints a picture of growing scrutiny over an institution that has traditionally been held in high regard for its impartiality.

With the Lok Sabha elections on the horizon, the integrity and perceived independence of the Election Commission become paramount.

Pawar's comments serve as a poignant reminder that in a vibrant democracy, institutions must not only be independent but also perceived as such by the public and political stakeholders.

When a major political party like the BJP feels compelled to vigorously defend the EC against criticism, it inadvertently suggests a lack of inherent strength or autonomy, thereby deepening the very mistrust it seeks to counter. The debate ignited by Rahul Gandhi's remarks and exacerbated by the BJP's reaction, as Pawar suggests, represents a critical juncture for India's democratic foundations.